|
Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-76
|
Terminal sedation: Palliative care for intractable pain, post Glucksberg and Quill
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COURT;
DEATH;
EUTHANASIA;
HUMAN;
INTRACTABLE PAIN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PATIENT RIGHT;
POLICY;
REVIEW;
SEDATION;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT;
CRIMINAL LAW;
CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DEHYDRATION;
ETHICS;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LONG TERM CARE;
METHODOLOGY;
MODEL PENAL CODE;
MORTALITY;
PAIN RELIEF PROMOTION ACT (1999 BILL);
RIGHT TO DIE;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
UNITED STATES;
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT;
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT;
CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MODEL PENAL CODE;
PAIN RELIEF PROMOTION ACT (1999 BILL);
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
CRIMINAL LAW;
DEHYDRATION;
EUTHANASIA;
HUMANS;
HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
PAIN, INTRACTABLE;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0642305352
PISSN: 00988588
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (0)
|