Dynamic modeling and jaw biomechanics

Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL1, 2003, Pages 59-65

  Hannam, A G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dynamic models; Jaw biomechanics; Jaw movements; Jawmuscles

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAW; MASTICATORY MUSCLE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISCOSITY;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW; MASTICATORY MUSCLES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0642303895     PISSN: 16016335     EISSN: 16016343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.236.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beek M, Koolstra JH, Van Ruijven LJ, Van Eijden TMGJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the cartilagenous structures in the human temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 2001;80:1913-8.
2. O'Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:648-57.
3. Koolstra JH. Dynamics of the human masticatory system. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002;13:368-80.
4. Hannam AG, Wood WW. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton and jaw biomechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1989;80:429-45.
5. Van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Prahl-Andersen B, Valk J, Van Ginkel FC. Comparison of jaw muscle bite force cross-sections obtained by means of magnetic resonance imaging and high-resolution CT-scanning. J Dent Res 1989;68:1765-70.
6. Van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Jaw muscle orientation and moment arms of long-face and normal adults. J Dent Res 1996;75:1372-80.
7. Raadsheer MC, Van Eijden TMGJ, Van Spronsen PH, Van Ginkel FC, Kiliaridis S, Prahl-Andersen B. A comparison of human masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39: 1079-84.
8. Goto TK, Langenbach GEJ, Hannam AG. Length changes in the human masseter muscle after jaw movement. Anat Rec 2001;262:293-300.
9. Zhang F, Langenbach GEJ, Hannam AG, Herring SW. Mass properties of the pig mandible. J Dent Res 2001;80:327-35.
10. Zhang F, Peck CC, Hannam AG. Mass properties of the human mandible. J Biomech 2002;35:975-8.
11. Peck CC, Langenbach GEJ, Hannam AG. Dynamic simulation of muscle and articular properties during wide jaw opening. Arch Oral Biol 2000;45:963-82.
12. Peck CC, Sooch AS, Hannam AG. Forces resisting jaw displacement in relaxed humans: a predominantly viscous phenomenon. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:151-60.
13. Palla S, Krebs M, Gallo LM. Jaw tracking and temporomandibular joint animation. In: McNeill C, editor. Science and Practice of Occlusion. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1997. pp. 365-78.
14. Peck CC, Yashiro K, Hannam AG. Dynamic changes in articular and occlusal forces during simulated tooth clenching. J Dent Res 2002;81:377 (Special Issue A; abstract).
15. Yashiro K, Peck CC, Hannam AG. Dynamic simulation of different occlusal schemes during tooth clenching. J Dent Res 2002;81:377 (Special Issue A; abstract).
16. Langenbach GEJ, Hannam AG. The role of passive muscle tensions in a three-dimensional dynamic model of the human jaw. Arch Oral Biol 1999;44:557-73.
17. Langenbach GEJ, Zhang F, Herring SW, Hannam AG. Modelling the masticatory biomechanics of a pig. J Anat 2002;201:383-93.
18. Prendergast PJ. An analysis of theories in biomechanics. Eng Trans 2002;49:117-33.
19. Van der Meulin MCH, Huiskes R. Why mechanobiology? A survey article. J Biomech 2002;35:401-14.