Outcomes in hand rehabilitation using occupational therapy services

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 499-506

  Case Smith, Jane ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Effects; Functional performance; Hand therapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM INJURY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HAND; HAND SURGERY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTPATIENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; CLINICAL TRIAL; HAND INJURY; INTERVENTION STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HAND INJURIES; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTPATIENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0642274866     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.499     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amadio, P. C., Silverstein, M. D., Ilstrup, D. M., Schleck, C. D., & Jensen, L. M. (1996). Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: The relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific and physical examination measures. Journal of Hand Surgery, 21A, 338-346.
2. Atroshi, I., Johnsson, R., & Sprinchorn, A. (1998). Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome: Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthopedics Scandinavia, 69, 82-89.
3. Beaton, D. E., Katz, J. N., Fossel, A. G., Wright, J. G., Tarasuk, V., & Bombardier, C. (2001). Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14(2), 128-146.
4. Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Jones, N., O'Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Usherwood, T., et al. (1992). Validating the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. BMJ, 305, 160-164.
5. Chen, C., Neufeld, P. S., Feely, C. A., & Skinner, C. S. (1999). Factors influencing compliance with home exercise programs among patients with upper-extremity impairment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 171-180.
6. Cooper, C. (2002). Hand impairments. In C. A. Trombly & M. V. Radomski (Eds.), Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction, (5th ed., pp. 927-964). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
7. Institute for Work and Health. (1997). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcomes (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: DASH Publications.
8. Law, M., Polatajko, H., Pollock, N., McColl, M., Carswell, A., & Baptiste, S. (1994). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: Results of pilot testing. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 191-197.
9. Law, M., Baptiste, S., Carswell, A., McColl, M., Polatajko, H., & Pollock, N. (1998). Canadian Occupational Performance Measures (3rd ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT.
10. Law, M., & Mills, J. (1998). Client-centered occupational therapy, In M. Law (Ed.), Client-centered occupational therapy (pp. 1-18). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
11. MacDermid, J. C. (2001). Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: Issues in instruments development and evaluation. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14, 105-114.
12. MacDermid, J. C. (2002). Outcome measurement in the upper extremity. In E. J. Mackin, A. D. Callahan, T. M. Shriver, L. H. Scheider, & A. L. Osterman (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity (5th ed.), Vol. 1. St. Louis: Mosby.
13. MacDermid, J. C., Richards, R. S., & Roth, J. H. (2001). Distal radius fracture: A prospective outcome study of 275 patients. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14, 154-169.
14. McColl, M. A., Paterson, M., Davies, D., Doubt, L., & Law, M. (2000). Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 22-30.
15. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
16. Sander, A. M., Fuchs, K. L., High, W. M., Hall, K. M., Kreutzer, J. S., & Rosenthal, M. (1999). The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: Assessment of factor structure and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1303-1308.
17. Sanford, J., Law, M., Swanson, L., & Guyant, G. (1994). Assessing clinically important change on an outcome of rehabilitation in older adults. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Society of Aging. San Francisco, CA.
18. Taylor, E., & Humphry, R. (1991). Survey of physical agent modality use. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 924-930.
19. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. (1991). Functional Independence Measure (Version 5.0) [Computer software]. Buffalo, NY: Author.
20. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, Inc.
21. Willer, B., Ottenbacher, K. J., & Coad, M. L. (1994). The community integration questionnaire. A comparative examination. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 103-111.
22. Willer, B., Rosenthal, M. J., Kreutzer, J. S., Gordon, W. A., & Rempel, R. (1993). Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 75-87.
23. World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva: Author.