Institutional investor heterogeneity: Implications for strategic decisions

Corporate Governance: An International Review

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 166-173

  Sherman, Hugh ^a   Beldona, Sam ^b   Joshi, Maheshkumar P ^c  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAINT JOSEPH S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0542445568     PISSN: 09648410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00101     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baysinger, B.D., Kosnik, R.D. and Turk, T.A. (1991) 'Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy', Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 205-214.
2. Black, B. (1992) 'Agents watching agents: the promise of institutional investor voice', UCLA Law Review, 39, pp. 811-893.
3. Brancato, C. (1993) The Brancato report on Institutional investors. Riverside Economic Research, 1, 1 Dec.
4. Brickley, J., Lease, R. and Smith, C. (1988) 'Ownership structure and voting on anti-takeover amendments', Journal of Financial Economics, 20, pp. 267-291.
5. Chaganti, R., Sherman, H. and Damanpour, F. (1993) 'The role of institutional investors in corporate governance', in Glass, H. (ed.) 1994 Handbook of Business Strategy, New York: Faulkner & Gray.
6. Graves, S. (1988) 'Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry', Academy of Management Journal, 31, pp. 417-428.
7. Graves, S.B. and Waddock, S.A. (1994) 'Institutional owners and corporate social performance', Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 1034-1046.
8. Graves, S. and Waddock, S. (1990) 'Institutional ownership and control: Implications for long term corporate strategy', Academy of Management Executive, 4(1), pp. 75-83.
9. Hansen, G.S. and Hill, C.W. (1991) 'Are institutional investors myopic? A time series study of four technology driven industries', Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 577-590.
10. Hoskisson, R.E., Johnson, R.A. and Moesel, D. (1994) 'Corporate divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: Effects of governance, strategy and performance', Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 1207-1251.
11. Jarrell, G., Lehn, K. and Marr, W. (1985) 'Institutional ownership, tender offers and long-term investments', Office of the Chief Economist, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C.
12. Kochar, R. and David, P. (1996) 'Institutional investors and firm innovation; a test of competing hypotheses', Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 73-84.
13. Melcher, R. and Oster, P. (1993) 'Relationship Investing', Business Week, 15 March, pp. 68-75.
14. Monks, R. and Minow, N. (1995) Corporate Governance, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
15. Norton, R. (1991) 'Who owns this company, anyhow?', Fortune, 29 July, pp. 131-142.
16. Nussbaum, B. and Dobrzynski, J. (1987) 'The battle for corporate control', Business Week, 18 May, pp. 102-109.
17. Parker, M. and Givant, M. (1987) 'Executives warned of proxy vote liability', Pensions & Investment Age, 15, May, pp. 53-58.
18. Pound, J. (1988) 'Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight', Journal of Financial Economics, 20, Jan/March, pp. 237-265.
19. Roe, M.J. (1990) 'Political and legal restraints on ownership and control of public companies', Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp. 7-41.
20. Star, M. (1993) 'Sears resolution gains support', Pensions & Investments, 21(9), pp. 2 & 46.
21. Stewart, T. (1993) 'The King is dead', Fortune, January 11, pp. 34-41.
22. Taylor, W. (1990) 'Can big owners make a big difference', Harvard Business Review, September-October, pp. 70-82.
23. Useem, M. (1993) Executive Defense: Shareholder Power & Corporate Reorganization, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.