The effects of level of automation on the out-of-the-loop unfamiliarity in a complex dynamic fault-management task during simulated spaceflight operations

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 44-48

  Lorenz, Bernd ^a   Di Nocera, Francesco ^b   Röttger, Stefan ^c   Parasuraman, Raja ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; FAULT TREE ANALYSIS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS (SPACECRAFT); STATISTICAL TESTS;

FAULT MANAGEMENT; OUT-OF-LOOP UNFAMILIARITY (OOTLUF);

SPACE FLIGHT;

EID: 0442326556     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120104500209     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Billings, C.S. (1997). Aviation automation: the search for a human-centered approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Caldwell, B.S. (2000). Information and communication technology needs for distributed communication and coordination during expedition-class spaceflight. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 71, Supplement, A6-A10.
3. Christoffersen, K., Woods, D.D. (in press). How to make automated systems team players. In E Salas (Ed.), Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, Volume 2. JAI Press/Elsevier.
4. st International Mars society Convention Proceedings.
5. Endsley, M.R. & Kiris, E.O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37, 381-394.
6. Endsley, M.R. & Kaber, D.B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42, 462-492.
7. Hart, S.G., & Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload. (pp. 143-154). New York: Plenum.
8. Hockey, G.R.J., Wastell, D., & Sauer, J. (1998). Effects of sleep deprivation and user interface on complex performance: a multilevel analysis of compensatory control. Human Factors, 40, 233-253.
9. Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
10. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., & Wickens, C.D. (2000). A model of types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 286-297.
11. Sauer, J., Hockey, G.R.J., & Wastell, D. (1999a). Maintenance of complex performance during a 135-day spaceflight simulation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70, 236-244.
12. Sauer, J., Hockey, G.R.J., & Wastell, D. (1999b). Performance evaluation in analogue environments: adaptation during an 8-month Antarctic over-wintering expedition. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70, 230-235.
13. Sauer, J., Hockey, G.R.J., & Wastell, D. (2000). The effects of training on short- and long-term skill retention in a complex multiple-task environment, Ergonomics, 43, 2043-2064.
14. Wickens, C.D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
15. Wickens, C.D., Kessel, C. (1981). Failure detection in dynamic systems. In Rasmussen, J, Rouse, WB (Eds.). Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures (pp. 155-169). New York: Plenum Press.
16. Wiener, E.L., Curry, R.E. (1980). Flight deck automation: promises and problems. Ergonomics, 23, 995-1011.