Tactical routing using two-dimensional and three-dimensional views of terrain

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 1409-1413

  St John, Mark ^a   Smallman, Harvey S ^a   Bank, Timothy E ^a   Cowen, Michael B ^b  

^a Pac Sci/Engineering Group Inc   (United States)

^b Naval Command   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TACTICAL ROUTING; TERRAINS;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; ANTENNAS; INSTRUMENT DISPLAYS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

MAPS;

EID: 0442325659     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Dennehy, M. T., Nesbitt, D. W., & Sumey, R. A. (1994). Real-time three-dimensional graphics display for anti-air warfare command and control, Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, vol. 15, pp. 110-119.
2. Haskell, I. D. & Wickens, C. D. (1993). Two and three-dimensional displays for aviation: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 87-109.
3. Smallman, H.S., St. John, M., Oonk, H.M., and Cowen, M.B. (2001) Comparing methods of information availability in 2-D and 3-D displays. IEEE: Computer Graphics and Application (special issue on Applied Perception), in press.
4. St. John, M., & Cowen, M. B. (1999). Using 2-D vs. 3-D displays: Gestalt and precision tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5. St. John, M., Cowen, M. B., Smallman, H. S., & Oonk, H. M. (2001). The use of 2-D and 3-D displays for shape understanding vs. relative position tasks. Human Factors. In press.
6. St. John, M., Smallman, H.S., Bank, T. E. & Cowen, M. B. (2001). Tactical routing using two-dimensional and three-dimensional views of terrain. Technical report 1849. San Diego: Space and Naval Warfare System Center. http://www.spawar.navy.mil/sti/publications/pubs/tr/1849/tr/1849.pdf
7. Van Orden, K F & Broyles J. W (2000). Visuospatial task performance as a function of two- and three-dimensional display presentation techniques. Displays, 21, 17-24.
8. Warren,R. & Wertheim, A. H. (1990). Perception and control of self-motion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473-494.
10. Wickens, C.D., & May, P. (1994) Terrain representation for Air Traffic Control: A comparison of perspective with plan view displays. U. Illinois. Inst. Aviation Tech. Rep. ARL-94-10/FAA-94-2, Savoy, IL: Aviation Res. Lab.
11. Wickens, C. D., & Prevett, T. T. (1995). Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 110-135.
12. Woods, D.D. (1984). Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 229-244.