Robustness of complete diallel crosses plans to the unavailability of one block

Journal of Applied Statistics

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 827-837

  Ghosh, D K ^a   Desai, Naimesh R ^a  

^a SAURASHTRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0442320508     PISSN: 02664763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02664769822819     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AGARWAL, S. C. & DAS, M. N. (1990) Use of n-ary block designs in diallel crosses evaluation, Journal of Applied Statistics, 17, pp. 125-131.
2. BAKSALARY, J. K. & TABIS, Z. (1987) Conditions for the robustness of block designs against the unavailability of data, Journal of Statist. Planning Inference, 16, pp. 49-54.
3. CURNOW, R. N. (1963) Sampling the diallel crosses, Biometrics, 19, pp. 278-306.
4. DAS, M. N. & GIRI, N. C. (1986) Design and Analysis of Experiments (Wiley Eastern).
5. DAS, A. & KAGEYAMA, S. (1992) Robustness of BIB and extended BIB designs against the unavailability of any number of observations in a block, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, pp. 343-358.
6. DAS, M. N. & SIVARAM, K. (1968) Partial diallel crosses and incomplete block design. Contribution on statistics and agricultural science, Industrial Agriculture Stat. New Delhi.
7. DEY, A. & DHALL, S. P. (1988) Robustness of augmented BIB designs, Sankhya B, 50, pp. 376-381.
8. FYFE, J. L. & GILBERT, N. E. G. (1963) Partial diallel crosses, Biometrics, 19, pp. 278-286.
9. DIVECHA, J. & GHOSH, D. K. (1994) Incomplete block designs for complete diallel crosses and their analysis, Journal of Applied Statistics, 21, pp. 395-408.
10. GHOSH, D. K., DIVECHA, J. & DAS, M. N. (1990) Note on partial diallel crosses from incomplete block designs, Gujarat Statistical Review, 17, pp. 5-6.
11. GHOSH, D. K. & DIVECHA, J. (1997) PBIB(2) design and partial diallel crosses, Biometrika, March.
12. GHOSH, S. (1982a) Robustness of designs against the unavailability of data, Sankhya B, 44, pp. 50-62.
13. GHOSH, S., RAO, S. B. & SINGHI, N. M. (1983) On robustness property of PBIBD, Journal of Statist. Planning Inference, 8, pp. 355-363.
14. GILBERT, N. E. G. (1958) Diallel crosses in plant breeding, Heredity, 12, pp. 477-492.
15. GRIFFING, B. (1956a) A generalised treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance, Heredity, 10, pp. 31-50.
16. GRIFFING, B. (1956b) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems, Australian Journal of Biological Science, 9, pp. 463-493.
17. HEDAYAT, A. & JOHN, P. W. M. (1974) Resistant and susceptible BIB designs, Annals of Statistics, 2, pp. 148-158.
18. HINKELMANN, K. & STERN, K. (1960) Kreuzungsplane zur selecktionszuchtung bei waldbaumen, Silv. Genet. g, pp. 121-133.
19. HINKELMANN, K. (1975) Design of genetical experiments. A Survey of Statistical Design and Linear Models (Amsterdam, North-Holland).
20. JOHN, P. W. M. (1976) Robustness of balanced incomplete block designs. Annals of Statistics, 4, pp. 960-962.
21. KAUSHIK, L. S., PURI, P. D. & MEHTA, B. D. (1987) Augmented partial diallel crosses based on two associate class association scheme, Statistica, 47, pp. 389-401.
22. KEMPTHORNE, O. (1957) An Introduction of Genetic Statistics (New York, Wiley).
23. KEMPTHORNE, O. & CURNOW, R. N. (1961) The partial diallel crosses, Biometrics, 17, pp. 225-250.
24. MATHON, R. & ROSA, A. (1990) Tables of parameters of BIBDs with r≤41 including existence, enumeration and resolvability results. An update, Ars Combinatoria, 30, pp. 65-96.
25. MUKERJEE, R. & KAGEYAMA, S. (1990) Robustness of group divisible designs, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 19, pp. 3189-3203.
26. IVASTAVA, R., GUPTA, V. K. & DEY, A. (1990) Robustness of some designs against missing observations, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 19, pp. 121-126.