The los angeles school of urbanism: An intellectual history

Urban Geography

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 493-509

  Dear, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANNING PRACTICE; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GEOGRAPHY; URBAN PLANNING;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0442312417     PISSN: 02723638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.24.6.493     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abbott, A., 1999, Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Abbott, A., 2002, Los Angeles and the Chicago School: A comment on Michael Dear. City and Community, Vol. 1, 33-38.
3. Banham, R., 1971, Los Angeles: The Architecture of Four Ecologies. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
4. Beauregard, R., 2003, City of superlatives. City and Community, Vol. 2, No. 3, 183-199.
5. Bobo, L. D., Oliver, M. L., Johnson, J. H., and Valenzuela, A., editors, 2000, Prismatic Metropolis: Inequality in Los Angeles. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
6. Brenner, N., 2003, Stereotypes, archetypes, and prototypes: Three uses of superlatives in contemporary urban studies. City and Community, Vol. 2, 205-216.
7. Burgess, E. W., 1925, The growth of the city. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, and R. McKenzie, editors, The City: Suggestions of Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 47-62.
8. Cartier, C., 2002, Transnational urbanism in the reform-era Chinese city: Landscapes from Shenzhen. Urban Studies, Vol. 39, 1513-1532.
9. Cenzatti, M., 1993, Los Angeles and the L. A. School: Postmodernism and Urban Studies. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles Forum for Architecture and Urban Design.
10. Clark, T., 2002, Codifying LA chaos. City and Community, Vol. 1, 51-57.
11. Davis, M., 1989, Homeowners and homeboys: Urban restructuring in L.A. Enclitic, Summer, 9-16.
12. Davis, M., 1990, City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. New York, NY: Verso.
13. Dear, M., 2000, The Postmodern Urban Condition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
14. Dear, M., editor, 2001, From Chicago to LA: Making Sense of Urban Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Dear, M., 2002, Los Angeles and the Chicago School: Invitation to a debate. City and Community, Vol. 1, 5-32.
16. Dear, M., 2003, Superlative urbanisms: The necessity for rhetoric in social theory. City and Community, Vol. 2, 201-204.
17. Dear, M. and Flusty, S., 1998, Postmodern urbanism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 88, 50-72.
18. Dear, M. and Flusty, S., editors, 2001, The Spaces of Postmodernity: A Reader in Human Geography. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19. Dear, M. J., Schockman, H. Eric, and Hise, G., editors, 1996, Rethinking Los Angeles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Ethington, P. and Meeker, M., 2001, Saber y conocer: The metropolis of urban inquiry. In M. Dear, editor, From Chicago to LA: Making Sense of Urban Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 403-420.
21. Fine, G. A., editor, 1995, A Second Chicago School?: The Development of a Postwar American Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Folgelson, R. M., 1993 [1967], The Fragmented Metropolis: Los Angeles 1850-1970. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23. Flusty, S., 2003, De-Coca-Colonization: Making the World From the Inside Out. New York, NY: Routledge.
24. Garreau, J., 1991, Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York, NY: Anchor.
25. Gottdeiner, M., Collins, C. C., and Dickens, D. R., 1999, Las Vegas: The Social Production of an All-American City. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26. Gottdeiner, M. and Klephart, G., 1991, The multinucleated metropolitan region. In R. Kling, O. Spencer, and M. Poster, editors, Postsuburban California: The Transformation of Orange County since World War II. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 31-54.
27. Harris, C. D. and Ullman, E. L., 1945, The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 242, pp. 7-17.
28. Harris, C. D., 1997, The nature of cities, Urban Geography, Vol. 18, 15-35.
29. Heikkila, E. J. and Pizarro, R., editors, 2002, Southern California and the World. Westport, CT: Praeger.
30. Hise, G., 1997, Magnetic Los Angeles: Planning the Twentieth-Century Metropolis. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Hoyt, H., 1933, One Hundred Years of Land Values in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Hoyt, H., 1939, The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Washington, DC: United States Federal Housing Administration.
33. James, D., editor, 2003, The Sons and Daughters of Los: Culture and Community in L.A. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
34. Jencks, C., 1993, Heteropolis: Los Angeles, the Riots, and the Strange Beauty of Heteroarchitecture. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
35. Keil, R., 1998, Los Angeles. New York, NY: Wiley.
36. Kenny, M. R., 2001, Mapping Gay L.A. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
37. McWilliams, C., 1973 [1946], Southern California: An Island on the Land. Santa Barbara, CA: Peregrine Smith.
38. Miller, D. W., 2000, The new urban studies. Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 50, August 18, A15-A16.
39. Molotch, H., 2002, School’s out: A response to Michael Dear. City and Community, Vol. 1, 39-43.
40. Nijman, J., 1996, Breaking the rules: Miami in the urban hierarchy. Urban Geography, Vol. 17, 5-22.
41. Nijman, J., 1997, Globalization to a Latin beat: The Miami Growth Machine. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 551, 163-176.
42. Pincetl, S., 1999, Transforming California: A Political History of Land Use and Development. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
43. Portes, A. and Stepick, A., 1993, City on the Edge: The Transformation of Miami. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
44. Pulido, L., 2000, Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 90, 12-40.
45. Robinson, C. M., 1907, The City Beautiful. Report to the Mayor, City Council and Members of the Municipal Art Commission. Los Angeles, CA: City of Los Angeles.
46. Roseman, C., Laux, H., and Thieme, G., editors, 1996, EthniCity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
47. Sampson, R. J., 2002, Studying modern Chicago. City and Community, Vol. 1, 45-48.
48. Sassen, S., 2002, Scales and spaces. City and Community, Vol. 1, 48-50.
49. Scott, A.J. 1993, Technopolis: High-Technology Development and Regional Development in Southern California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50. Scott, A. J., and Soja, E. W., 1986, Los Angeles: Capital of the late 20th century. Society and Space, Vol. 4, 249-254.
51. Scott, A. J. and Soja, E. W., editors, 1996, The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
52. Smith, M. P., 2001, Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
53. Soja, E. W., 1986, Taking Los Angeles apart: Some fragments of a critical human geography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 4, 255-272.
54. Soja, E. W., 1989, Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. New York, NY: Verso.
55. Trumble, W. R., Brown, L., Stevenson, A., and Siefring, J., editors, 1999, Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56. Waldinger, R. and Bozorgmehr, M., editors, 1996, Ethnic Los Angeles. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
57. Wirth, L., 1925, A bibliography of the urban community. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, and R. McKenzie, editors, The City: Suggestions of Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 161-228.
58. Wolch, J. and Dear, M., 1993, Malign Neglect: Homelessness in an American City. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
59. Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, 1998, Animal Geographies. London, UK: Verso.