Organizational communication and culture: A study of 10 Italian high-technology companies

Journal of Business Communication

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 253-268

  Morley, Donald Dean ^a   Shockley Zalabak, Pamela ^a   Cesaria, Ruggero ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b Instituto RSO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0442292374     PISSN: 00219436     EISSN: 15524582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002194369703400303     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Agar, M. (1979). Themes revisited: Some problems in cognitive anthropology. Discourse Processes, 2, 11-31.
2. Cheney, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
3. Cushman, D., King, S., & Smith, T. (1988). The rules perspective on organizational communication research. In G. M. Goldhaber & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 55-94). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
6. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
8. Morey, N. C., & Luthans, F. (1985). Refining the displacement of culture and the use of scenes and themes in organizational studies. Academy of Management Review, 10, 219-229.
9. Morley, D. D., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (1991). Setting the rules: An examination of the influence of organization founders' values. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 422-449.
10. Poole, M. S., & McPhee, R. D. (1983). A structural analysis of organizational climate. In L. Putnam & M. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 195-219). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74-102.
12. Schall, M. S. (1983). A communication-rules approach to organizational culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 557-581.
13. Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25, 3-16.
14. Shockley-Zalabak, P., & Morley, D. D. (1989). Adhering to organizational culture: What does it mean, why does it matter? Group & Organization Studies, 14, 483-500.
15. Shockley-Zalabak, P., & Cesaria, R. (1992). Regole di comunicazione. Sviluppo & Organizzazione, 134, 93-109.
16. Shockley-Zalabak, P., & Morley, D. D. (1994). Creating a culture: A longitudinal examination of the influence of management and employee values on communication rule stability and emergence. Human Communication Research, 20, 334-355.
17. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
18. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
19. Weick, K. R., & Van Orden, P. W. (1991). Organizing on a global scale: A research and teaching agenda. Human Resource Management, 29, 49-61.