The Stockholm county council refunds home births in specific cases;Stockholms läns landsting betalar hemförlossning i vissa fall: Strikta medicinska kriterier och krav på barnmorskorna måste dock uppfyllas

Lakartidningen

Volumn 100, Issue 51-52, 2003, Pages 4272-4277

  Wiklund, Ingela ^a   Lindvall, Kaj ^b   Sachs, Magna Andreen ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b Stockholm läns Landsting ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; EMERGENCY WARD; HOME DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL STAFF; MEDICINE;

DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HOME CHILDBIRTH; HUMANS; MIDWIFERY; PREGNANCY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISMS; SWEDEN;

EID: 0442277776     PISSN: 00237205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Olsen O. Meta-analysis of the safety of home birth. Birth 1997;24:4-13.
2. Bastian H, Kerise MJ, Lancaster PA. Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: a population based study. BMJ 1998;317:384-8.
3. Olsen O, Jewell MD. Home versus hospital birth. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 1988.
4. Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Farquharson DF, Peacock D, et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation in British Columbia. CMJ 2002;166:315-23.
5. Waldenström U, Nilsson CA. Characteristics of women choosing birth center care. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:181-8.
6. Socialstyrelsens allmänna råd om hemförlossning. Socialstyrelsens författningssamling. SOSFS 1990:22.
7. Handläggning av normal förlossning [state of the art]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2000. www.sos.se/mars/sta/2001-123-1
8. Ngenda N, Khoo SK. Failed homebirths: Reason for transfer to hospital and maternal/neonatal outcome. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 1996;36:275-8.
9. Waldenström U, Nilsson CA, Winbladh B. The Stockholm birth centre trial: maternal and infant outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:410-8.
10. Regionalt Vårdprogram. Normal graviditet, förlossning och eftervård. Stockholms läns landsting; 2002. www.hsn/sll/se/mpa
11. Kevin S, William A, Block JR. Uterine rupture: what family physicians need to know. Am Fam Physician 2002;66:823-8.
12. Sandall J. Choice, continuity and control: changing midwifery towards a sociological perspective. Midwifery 1995;11:201-9.
13. Klaus MH, Kenell JH. Maternal-infant bonding. St Louis: Mosby; 1996.
14. DeVries RG. »Humanizing« childbirth: the discovery and implementation of bonding theory. Int J Health Serv 1984;14:89-104.
15. Haninger NC, Farley CL. Screening for hypoglycemia in healthy neonates: effects on breastfeeding. J Midwifery Womens Health 2001;46:292-310.
16. Righard L. Are breastfeeding problems related to incorrect breast feeding technique and the use of pacifiers and bottles? Birth 1998;25:40-4.
17. Farquhar M, Camilleri-Ferranti C, Todd C. Continuity of care in maternity service: women's views of one team midwives scheme. Midwifery 2000;16:35-47.