A Gift in Return: The Clinical Use of Writing about a Patient

Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 247-259

  Pizer, Stuart A ^a,b,c,d  

^a Massachusetts Inst for Psychoanal   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Ethics Comm Psychoanal Consortium   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348246170     PISSN: 10481885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10481881009348535     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Ankori, G. (1998), Case study writing and the therapeutic relationship: A case of reciprocal influence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology.
2. Davies, J. M. & Frawley, M. G. (1994), Treating the Adult Survivor of Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Psychoanalytic Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
3. Lipton, E. (1991), The analyst's use of clinical data, and other issues of confidentiality. J. Amer. Psychoanal Assn., 39:967-985.
4. Pizer, S. A. (1992), The negotiation of paradox in the analytic process. Psychoanal. Dial., 2:215-240.
5. _ (1995), Multiplicity, paradox and the creative self. Invited paper, International Psychoanalytical Congress, San Francisco, August 3.
6. _ (1998), Building Bridges: The Negotiation of Paradox in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
7. Stein, M. (1988), Writing about psychoanalysis: II. Analysts who write, patients who read. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:393-408.
8. Stoller, R. (1988), Patients' responses to their own case reports. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36:371-391.