Chemical or manual release of black spruce? Case study within the balsam fir - white birch ecosystems in Quebec;Degagement chimique ou manuel de plantations d'epinette noire? Etude de cas dans le domaine de la sapiniere a bouleau blanc au Quebec

Forestry Chronicle

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 973-979

  Jobidon, Robert ^a   Trottier, François ^a   Charette, Lise ^a  

^a MINISTÈRE DES RESSOURCES NATURELLES ET DE LA FAUNE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Black spruce; Chemical release; Competition; Manual release; Red raspberry; Spruce plantations

Indexed keywords

RUBUS IDAEUS;

EID: 0348233224     PISSN: 00157546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5558/tfc75973-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baskerville, G.L. 1972. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can. J. For. Res. 2 : 49-53.
2. Bell, F.W., R.A. Lautenschlager, R.G. Wagner, D.G. Pitt, J.W. Hawkins et K.R. Ride. 1997. Motor-manual, mechanical, and herbicide release affect early successional vegetation in northwestern Ontario. For. Chron. 73 : 61-68.
3. Brand, D.G. et P.S. Janas. 1988. Growth and acclimation of planted white pine and white spruce seedlings in response to environmental conditions. Can. J. For. Res. 18 : 320-329.
4. Elliott, K.J. et A.S. White. 1993. Effects of competition from young northern hardwoods on red pine seedling growth, nutrient use efficiency, and leaf morphology. For. Ecol. Manage. 57 : 233-255.
5. Gouvernement du Québec. 1994. Une stratégie. Aménager pour mieux protéger les forêts. Ministère des Ressources naturelles. Direction des programmes. 197 p.
6. Jobidon, R. 1992. Measurement of light transmission in young conifer plantations : a new technique for assessing herbicide efficacy. North. J. Appl. For. 9 : 112-115.
7. Jobidon, R. 1994. Light threshold for optimal black spruce (Picea mariana) seedling growth and development under brush competition. Can. J. For. Res. 24 : 1629-1635.
8. Jobidon, R. 1995. Autécologie de quelques espèces de compétition d'importance pour la régénération forestière au Québec. Revue de littérature. Ministère des Ressources naturelles. Direction de la recherche forestière. Mémoire de recherche forestière No 117. 180 p.
9. Jobidon, R. 1997a. Stump height effects on sprouting of mountain maple, paper birch and pin cherry - 10 year results. For. Chron. 73 : 590-595.
10. Jobidon, R. 1997b. Pin cherry sucker regeneration after cutting. North. J. Appl. For. 14 : 117-119.
11. Jobidon, R. et L. Charette. 1992. Dégagement mécanique et manuel de jeunes plantations de conifères. Étude d'efficacité cinq ans après le traitement. Ministère des Ressources naturelles. Direction de la recherche forestière. Mémoire de recherche forestière No 105. 30 p.
12. Jobidon, R. et L. Charette. 1997. Effets, après 10 ans, du dégagement manuel simple ou répété et de la période de coupe de la végétation de compétition sur la croissance de l'épinette noire en plantation. Can. J. For. Res. 27 : 1979-1991.
13. Jobidon, R., L. Charette et P.Y. Bernier. 1998. Initial size and competing vegetation effects on water stress and growth of Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP seedlings planted in three different environments. For. Ecol. Manage. 103 : 293-305.
14. Lanner, R. M. 1985. On the intensity of height growth to spacing. For. Ecol. Manage. 13 : 143-148.
15. Lautenschlager, R. A. 1999. Environmental resource interactions affect red raspberry growth and its competition with white spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 29 : 906-916.
16. Lautenschlager, R. A., F. W. Bell, R. G. Wagner et J. A. Winters. 1997. The Fallingsnow ecosystem project : Comparing conifer release alternatives in northwestern Ontario. For. Chron. 73 : 35-38.
17. MacLean, D.A. et M.G. Morgan. 1983. Long-term growth and yield response of young fir to manual and chemical release from shrub competition. For. Chron. 59 : 177-183.
18. Morris, D.M., G.B. MacDonald et K.M. McClain. 1990. Evaluation of morphological attributes as response variables to perennial competition for 4-year old black spruce and jack pine seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 20 : 1696-1703.
19. Newton, M., E.C. Cole, M.L. McCormack Jr. et D.E. White. 1992. Young spruce-fir forests released by herbicides. II. Conifer response to residual hardwoods and overstocking. North. J. Appl. For. 9: 130-135.
20. Pitt, D.G., D.G. Thompson, N.J. Payne et E.G. Kettela. 1993. Response of woody eastern Canadian forest weeds to fall foliar treatments of glyphosate and triclopyr herbicides. Can. J. For. Res. 23 : 2490-2498.
21. Riou-Nivert, P. 1983. Sélection en sylviculture : une action à mener dès la pépinière. Forêt-Entreprise 83 : 22-36.
22. Stewart, R.E., L.L. Gross et B.H. Honkala. 1984. Effects of competing vegetation on forest trees : a bibliography with abstracts. US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-43.
23. Sutton, R.F. 1984. Plantation establishment in the boreal forest : glyphosate, hexazinone, and manual weed control. For. Chron. 60 : 24-28.
24. Wagner, R.G., G.H. Mohammed et T.L. Noland. 1999. Critical period of interspecific competition for northern conifers associated with herbaceous vegetation. Can. J. For. Res. 29 : 890-897.
25. Wabtad, J.D. et P.J. Kuch (eds.). 1987. Forest vegetation management for conifer production. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 523 p.