Optimal diet selection, frequency dependence and prey renewal

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 129-139

  Yearsley, Jonathan M ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENCOUNTER RATE; FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE; NUTRITIVE VALUE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PREY SELECTION;

EID: 0348228995     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00070-4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abrams P.A. The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. Amer. Nat. 153:1999;83-97.
2. Allen J.A. Evidence for stabilizing and apostatic selection by wild blackbirds. Nature. 237:1972;348-349.
3. Allen J.A. Further evidence for apostatic selection by wild passerine birds. training experiments Heredity. 33:1974;361-372.
4. Allen J.A. Frequency-dependent selection. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B. 319:1988;485-503.
5. Allen J.A. Searching for search image. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:1989;361.
6. Allen J.A., Anderson K.P. Selection by passerine birds is anti-apostatic at high prey density. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 23:1984;237-246.
7. Allen J.A., Clarke B.C. Evidence for apostatic selection by wild passerines. Nature. 220:1968;501-502.
8. Belovsky G.E. Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore. the moose Theoret. Popul. Biol. 14:1978;105-134.
9. Berec L., Křivan V. A mechanistic model for partial preferences. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 58:2000;279-289.
10. Brown J.S., Mitchell W.A. Diet selection on depletable resources. Oikos. 54:1989;33-43.
11. Charnov E.L. Optimal foraging. attack strategy of a mantid Amer. Nat. 110:1976;141-151.
12. Chesson J. Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology. 59:1978;211-215.
13. Chesson J. The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology. 64:1983;1297-1304.
14. Chesson P.L. Variable predators and switching behaviour. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 26:1984;1-26.
15. Church S.C., Allen J.A., Bradshaw J.W.S. Anti-apostatic food selection by the domestic cat. Anim. Behav. 48:1994;747-749.
16. Endler J.A. Interactions between predators and prey. Krebs J.R., Davies N.B. Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach. 3rd Edition:1991;169-201 Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
17. Engen S., Stenseth N.C. An ecological paradox. a food type may become more rare in the diet as a consequence of being more abundant Amer. Nat. 124:1984;352-359.
18. Gendron R.P. Models and mechanisms of frequency-dependent predation. Amer. Nat. 130:1987;603-623.
19. Gendron R.P., Staddon J.E.R. Searching for cryptic prey. the effect of search rate Amer. Nat. 121:1983;172-186.
20. Gordon I.J., Lindsay W.K. Could mammalian herbivores "manage" their resources? Oikos. 59:1990;270-280.
21. Greenwood J.J.D. The functional basis of frequency-dependent food selection. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 23:1984;177-199.
22. Greenwood J.J.D., Elton R.A. Analysing experiments on frequency-dependent selection by predators. J. Anim. Ecol. 48:1979;721-737.
23. Greenwood J.J.D., Blow N.C., Thomas G.E. More mice prefer rare food. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 23:1984;211-219.
24. Greenwood J.J.D., Johnston J.P., Thomas G.E. Mice prefer rare food. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 23:1984;201-210.
25. Heller R. On optimal diet in a patchy environment. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 17:1980;201-214.
26. Hirvonen H., Ranta E. Within-bout dynamics of diet choice. Behav. Ecol. 7:1996;494-500.
27. Holling C.S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomol. 91:1959;385-398.
28. Hubbard S.F., Cook R.M., Glover J.G., Greenwood J.J.D. Apostatic selection as an optimal foraging strategy. J. Anim. Ecol. 51:1982;625-633.
29. Jaeger R.G., Barnard D.E., Joseph R.G. Foraging tactics of a terrestrial salamander. assessing prey density Amer. Nat. 119:1982;885-890.
30. Křivan V. Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 49:1996;265-290.
31. Křivan V., Sikder A. Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics, II. Theoret. Popul. Biol. 55:1999;111-126.
32. MacArthur R.H., Pianka E.R. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Amer. Nat. 100:1966;603-609.
33. Manly B.F.J. Tables for the analysis of selective predation experiments. Res. Popul. Ecol. Kyoto. 14:1972;74-81.
34. Manly B.F.J. Measuring selectivity from multiple-choice feeding-preference experiments. Biometrics. 51:1995;709-715.
35. Marini M.A., Weale M.E. Density- and frequency-dependent predation of artificial bird nests. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 62:1997;195-208.
36. Mitchell W.A. An optimal control theory of diet selection. the effects of resource depletion and exploitative competition Oikos. 58:1990;16-24.
37. Murdoch W.W., Avery S., Smyth M.E.B. Switching in predatory fish. Ecology. 56:1975;1094-1105.
38. Murdoch W.W., Oaten A. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9:1975;1-131.
39. 2 Canadian J. Fisheries Aquatic Sci. 39:1982;914-923.
40. Sherratt T.N., Harvey I.F. Frequency-dependent food selection by arthropods. a review Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 48:1993;167-186.
41. Sherratt T.N., MacDougall A.D. Some population consequences of variation in preference among individual predators. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 55:1995;93-107.
42. Smithson A., MacNair M.R. Density-dependent and frequency dependent selection by bumblebees Bombus terrestris (L.) (hymenoptera: Apidae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 60:1997;401-417.
43. Stephens D.W., Krebs J.R. Foraging Theory. 1986;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
44. Tinbergen L. The natural control of insects in pine woods 1. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Arch. Neelandaises Zool. 13:1960;265-343.
45. Tucker G.M., Allen J.A. Selection by humans searching for computer-generated prey images. the effect of prey density Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 44:1991;169-174.
46. Tucker G.M., Allen J.A. The behavioural basis of apostatic selection by humans searching for computer-generated cryptic 'prey'. Anim. Behav. 46:1993;713-719.
47. Visser M.E. Optimal diet in depletable patches. a comparison of two papers Oikos. 61:1991;80-82.
48. Visser M.E. Prey selection by predators depleting a patch. Netherlands J. Zool. 41:1991;63-79.