Visual working memory for image statistics

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 541-556

  Victor, Jonathan D ^a   Conte, Mary M ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Isodipole; Symmetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING; INFORMATION; LUMINANCE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 0348226500     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aaltonen O., Niemi P., Nyrke T., Tuhkanen M. Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum. Biological Psychology. 24(3):1987;197-207.
2. Amano K., Uchikawa K., Kuriki I. Characteristics of color memory for natural scenes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A - Optics Image Science and Vision. 19(8):2002;1501-1514.
3. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review. 61:1954;183-193.
4. Bergen J.R., Adelson E.H. Early vision and texture perception. Nature. (333):1988;363-364.
5. Berlin B., Kay P. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. 1969;University of California Press, Berkeley.
6. Bornstein M.H., Korda N.O. Discrimination and matching within and between hues measured by reaction times: Some implications for categorical perception and levels of information processing. Psychological Research. 46(3):1984;207-222.
7. Caelli T., Julesz B. On perceptual analyzers underlying visual texture discrimination: Part I. Biological Cybernetics. 28(3):1978;167-175.
8. Caelli T., Julesz B., Gilbert E. On perceptual analyzers underlying visual texture discrimination: Part II. Biological Cybernetics. 29(4):1978;201-214.
9. Cho R.Y., Yang V., Hallett P.E. Reliability and dimensionality of judgments of visually textured materials. Perception & Psychophysics. 62(4):2000;735-752.
10. Chubb C., Landy M. Orthogonal distribution analysis: A new approach to the study of texture perception. Landy M.S., Movshon J.A. Computational models of visual processing. 1991;291-301 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Conte, M. M., Purpura, K. P., & Victor, J. D. (2002). Processing of image symmetry in an RSVP task. Society for Neuroscience, 28, Orlando, FL.
12. Conte, M. M., & Victor, J. D. (2003). Temporal stability of image statistics in visual working memory. Vision Sciences Society 2003, Sarasota, FL.
13. Cornelissen F.W., Greenlee M.W. Visual memory for random block patterns defined by luminance and color contrast. Vision Research. 40(3):2000;287-299.
14. Cover T.M., Thomas J.A. Elements of information theory. Wiley series in telecommunications. 1991;542 Wiley, New York.
15. Field D.J., Hayes A., Hess R.F. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local "association field" Vision Research. 33(2):1993;173-193.
16. Fishburn P.C., Sloane N.J.A. The solution to Berlekamp's switching game. Discrete Mathematics. 74:1989;263-290.
17. Freedman D.J., Riesenhuber M., Poggio T., Miller E.K. Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science. 291(5502):2001;312-316.
18. Freedman D.J., Riesenhuber M., Poggio T., Miller E.K. Visual categorization and the primate prefrontal cortex: Neurophysiology and behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology. 88(2):2002;929-941.
19. Friedman-Hill S.R., Robertson L.C., Treisman A. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science. 269(5225):1995;853-855.
20. Geisler W.S. Physical limits of acuity and hyperacuity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1(7):1984;775-782.
21. Graham N. Visual pattern analyzers. 1989;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
22. Graham N., Beck J., Sutter A. Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: Effects of sign and amount of contrast. Vision Research. 32(4):1992;719-743.
23. Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations. Perception & Psychophysics. 38(2):1985;141-171.
24. Harvey L.O. Jr., Gervais M.J. Internal representation of visual texture as the basis for the judgment of similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance. 7(4):1981;741-753.
25. Hayhoe M. Vision using routines: A functional account of vision. Visual Cognition. 7(1/2/3):2000;43-64.
26. Johnson D.H., Gruner C.M., Baggerly K., Seshagiri C. Information- theoretic analysis of neural coding. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 10(1):2001;47-69.
27. Joseph J.S., Optican L.M. Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences. Perception & Psychophysics. 58(5):1996;651-665.
28. Julesz B. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature. 290(5802):1981;91-97.
29. Julesz B. A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first-order statistics of texture. Biological Cybernetics. (41):1981;131-138.
30. Julesz B. Early vision and focal attention. Reviews of Modern Physics. 63(3):1991;735-772.
31. Julesz B., Gilbert E.N., Shepp L.A., Frisch H.L. Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in second-order statistics - revisited. Perception. 2(4):1973;391-405.
32. Julesz B., Gilbert E.N., Victor J.D. Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics. Biological Cybernetics. 31(3):1978;137-140.
33. Kovacs I., Julesz B. A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 90(16):1993;7495-7497.
34. Malik J., Perona P. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 7(5):1990;923-932.
35. Marr D. Vision. 1982;W.H. Freeman & Co, New York.
36. Pisoni D.B., Lazarus J.H. Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 55(2):1974;328-333.
37. Purpura K.P., Victor J.D., Katz E. Striate cortex extracts higher-order spatial correlations from visual textures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 91(18):1994;8482-8486.
38. Rainville S.J., Kingdom F.A. Spatial-scale contribution to the detection of mirror symmetry in fractal noise. Journal of the Optical Society of America A - Optics Image Science and Vision. 16(9):1999;2112-2123.
39. Rainville S.J., Kingdom F.A. Scale invariance is driven by stimulus density. Vision Research. 42(3):2002;351-367.
40. Roberson D., Davidoff J. The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference. Memory & Cognition. 28(6):2000;977-986.
41. Romo R., Merchant H., Zainos A., Hernandez A. Categorical perception of somesthetic stimuli: Psychophysical measurements correlated with neuronal events in primate medial premotor cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 7(4):1997;317-326.
42. Rosielle L.J., Cooper E.E. Categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition. Memory & Cognition. 29(1):2001;68-82.
43. Treisman A. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance. 8(2):1982;194-214.
44. Tyler C.W. Empirical aspects of symmetry perception. Spatial Vision. 9(1):1995;1-7.
45. Tyler C.W. Human symmetry detection exhibits reverse eccentricity scaling. Visual Neuroscience. 16(5):1999;919-922.
46. Victor J.D. Complex visual textures as a tool for studying the VEP. Vision Research. 25(12):1985;1811-1827.
47. Victor J.D. Isolation of components due to intracortical processing in the visual evoked potential. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 83(20):1986;7984-7988.
48. Victor J.D., Conte M.M. Cortical interactions in texture processing: Scale and dynamics. Visual Neuroscience. 2(3):1989;297-313.
49. Victor J.D., Conte M.M. What kinds of high-order correlation structure are readily visible? Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 30(Suppl.):1989;254.
50. Victor J.D., Conte M.M. Spatial organization of nonlinear interactions in form perception. Vision Research. 31(9):1991;1457-1488.
51. Victor J.D., Conte M.M. The role of high-order phase correlations in texture processing. Vision Research. 36(11):1996;1615-1631.
52. Victor, J. D., & Conte, M. M. (2001). Dynamics of selective spatial attention in a working memory task. Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, 42 (p. 863). Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
53. Victor, J. D., Hardy, C., & Conte, M. M. (2002). Visual processing of image statistics: Qualitative differences between local and global statistics; quantitative differences between low- and high-order statistics. Vision Sciences Society 2002, Sarasota, FL.
54. Wandell B.A. Color measurement and discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2(1):1985;62-71.
55. Wenderoth P. The salience of vertical symmetry. Perception. 23(2):1994;221-236.
56. Wilson H.R. Nonlinear processes in visual pattern discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 90(21):1993;9785-9790.
57. Zhu S.C., Wu Y., Mumford D. Filters, random fields and maximum entropy (FRAME): Towards a unified theory for texture modeling. International Journal of Computer Vision. 27(2):1998;107-126.