Nonlinearly constrained optimization theory to interpret magnetic anomalies due to vertical faults and thin dikes

Pure and Applied Geophysics

Volumn 161, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 203-219

  Asfahani, J ^a   Tlas, M ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Syrian Arab Republic)

Author keywords

Geomganetic interpretation; Magnetic anomalies; Mathematical optimization; Penalty function

Indexed keywords

DIKE; FAULT; GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONLINEARITY; OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 0348225400     PISSN: 00334553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-003-2433-x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ABDELRAHMAN, E. M. (1994), A Rapid Approach to Depth Determination from Magnetic Anomalies due to Simple Geometrical Bodies, J. Univ. of Kuwait (Science) 21, 109.
2. ABDELRAHMAN, E. M. and SHARAFELDIN, S. M. (1996), An Iterative Least-squares Approach to Depth Determination from Residual Magnetic Anomalies Due to Thin Dikes, Appl. Geophys. 34, 213.
3. ABDELRAHMAN, E. M. (1997), Depth Determination Using Moving Average Residual Magnetic Anomalies Due to Thin Dikes, The Arabian J. Sci. Engin. 22 (1A), 3.
4. ABDELRAHMAN, E. M. and HASSANEIN, H. I. (2000), Shape and Depth Solutions from Magnetic Data Using a Parametric Relationship. Geophys. 65 (1), 126.
5. ATCHUTA RAO, D. and RAM BABU, H. V. (1983), Standard Curves for the Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies over Vertical Faults, Geophys. Res. Bull, 21 (1), 71.
6. ATCHUTA RAO, D., RAM BABU, H. V., and SANKAR NARAYAN, P. V. (1980), Relationship of Magnetic Anomalies Due to Subsurface Features and Interpretation of Solving Contacts, Geophys. 45, 32.
7. BHATTACHARYYA, B. K. (1965), Two-dimensional Harmonic Analysis as a Tool for Magnetic Interpretation, Geophys. 30, 829.
8. BLAKELY, R. S., Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications (London, Cambridge University Press 1994).
9. GAY, S. P. (1963), Standard Curves for the Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies over Long Tabular Bodies, Geophys. 28, 161.
10. GAY, S. P. (1965), Standard Curves for the Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies over Long Horizontal Cylinders, Geophys. 30, 818.
11. GRANT, R. S. and WEST, G. F., Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1965).
12. HOOKE, R. and JEEVES, T. A. (1961), Direct Search Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 8.
13. MOHAN, N. L., SUNDARARAJAN, N., and SESHAGIRI RAO, S. V. (1982), Interpretation of Some Two-dimensional Magnetic Bodies Using Hilbert Transforms, Geophys. 47, 376.
14. NASH, J. C., Compact Numerical Method for Computers, Linear Algebra and Function Minimization (Adam Hilger 1990).
15. NETTLETON, L. L., Gravity and Magnetic in Oil Prospecting (New York, McGraw-Hill 1976).
16. PARKAR GAY, S. (1963), Standard Curves for Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies over Long Tabular Bodies, Geophys. 28, 161.
17. PHILLIPS, D. T., RAVINDRA, A., and SOLBER, J. J., Operations Research Principles and Practice (John Wiley 1976).
18. PRAKASA RAO, T. K. S., SUBRAHMANTAM, M., and SRIKRISHNA MURTHY, A. (1986), Nomograms for Direct Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies Due to Long Horizontal Cylinders, Geophys. 51, 1236.
19. QURESHI, I. R. and NALAYE, A. M. (1978), A Method for the Direct Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies Caused by Two-dimensional Vertical Faults, Geophys. 43, 179.
20. SILVA, J. B. C. (1989), Transformation of Nonlinear Problems into Linear Ones Applied to the Magnetic Field of a Two-dimensional Prism, Geophys. 54, 114.