Factual and Affective/Evaluative Recall of Pretrial Publicity: Their Relative Influence on Juror Reasoning and Verdict in a Simulated Fraud Trial

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1404-1416

  Honess, Terry M ^a   Charman, E A ^b   Levi, M ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348223634     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01955.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baron, M. R., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Brown, R., & Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5, 73-99.
3. Clark, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affect and cognition: The 17th annual Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Corker, D., & Levi, M. (1996). Pretrial publicity and its treatment in the English courts. Criminal Law Review, 622-632.
5. Costantini, E., & King, J. (1980). The partial juror: Correlates and causes of prejudgment. Law and Society Review, 15, 9-40.
6. Helgeson, V. S., & Shaver, K. G. (1990). Presumption of innocence: Congruence bias induced and overcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 276-302.
7. Heuer, L., & Penrod, S. (1994). Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 29-51.
8. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
9. Kassin, S. M., & Studebaker, C. A. (1998). Instructions to disregard and the jury: Curative and paradoxical effects. In J. M. Golding & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 413-434). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Kramer, G. P., Kerr, N. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 409-438.
11. Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1991). The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 345-367.
12. Ogloff, J. R. P., & Vidmar, N. (1994). The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors. A study to compare the relative effects of television and print media in a child sex abuse case. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 507-525.
13. Otto, A. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1994). The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 453-469.
14. Pratkanis, A. R., Greenwald, A. G., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1988). In search of reliable persuasion effects. III. The sleeper effect is dead: Long live the sleeper effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 203-218.
15. Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-326.
16. Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999). The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 219-235.
17. Studebaker, C. A., & Penrod, S. D. (1997). Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 3, 428-460.
18. Wilson, J. R., & Bornstein, B. H. (1998). Methodological considerations in pretrial publicity: Is the medium the message? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 585-597.