Optimum depth of investigation and conductivity response rejection of the different electromagnetic devices measuring apparent magnetic susceptibility

Archaeological Prospection

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 31-45

  Benech, C ^a   Marmet, E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b AFAN   (France)

Author keywords

Coincident loop; Investigation depth; Magnetic susceptibility; Slingram

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348206841     PISSN: 10752196     EISSN: 10990763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199903)6:1<31::AID-ARP112>3.0.CO;2-N     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Beausillon, R., Benech, Ch. and Tabbagh, A. (1996). A two frequency Slingram apparatus for archaeological and pedological application. 2nd Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society Meeting, Nantes, 2–5 September, pp. 15–18.
2. Clark, A. J. (1990). Seeing Beneath the Soil. London: Batsford.
3. Howell, B. (1966). A soil conductivity meter. Archaeometry 9: 20–23.
4. Howell, B. (1968). The soil conductivity anomaly detector (SCM) in archaeological prospection. Prospezioni Archeologiche 3: 101–104.
5. Nabighian, M. N. (1991). Electromagnetics Methods in Applied Geophysics. Vol. I, Theory 523 pp., Vol. II, Applications, 972 pp. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
6. Parchas, C. (1979). Mesures simultanées de la conductivité électrique et de la susceptibilité magnétique du sol. Paris: Thèse de 3ème cycle, Université Paris 6.
7. Parchas, A. and Tabbagh, A. (1978). Simultaneous measurement of electrical conductivity and magnetic susceptibility of the ground in the EM prospecting. Archaeophysika 10: 682–691.
8. Tabbagh, A. (1971). Définition des caractéristiques d’un appareil EM classique adapté à la prospection archéologique. Paris: Thèse de 3ème cycle, Université Paris.
9. Tabbagh, A. (1982). L’interprétation des données en prospection électromagnétique avec les appareils SH3 et EM15. Revue d’Achéométrie 6: 1–11.
10. Tabbagh, A. (1986). What is the best coil orientation in the Slingram electromagnetic prospection methods? Archaeometry 28: 185–196.
11. Tabbagh, A. and Dabas, M. (1996). Absolute magnetic viscosity determination using time-domain electromagnetic devices. Archaeological Prospection 3: 199–208.
12. Tite, M. S. and Mullins, C. (1969). Electromagnetic prospecting: a preliminary investigation. Prospezioni Archeologiche 9: 20–23.