Quality degradation in lossy wavelet image compression

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 210-215

  Chen, Tzong Jer ^a   Chuang, Keh Shih ^a   Wu, Jay ^a,b   Chen, Sharon C ^a   Hwang, Ing Ming ^a,c   Jan, Meei Ling ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

^c KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Moran test; Quality evaluation; Wavelet compression

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; LOSSY WAVELET IMAGE COMPRESSION; MORAL TEST;

IMAGE COMPRESSION;

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STANDARD;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0348167501     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-003-1652-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Huang HK: PACS-Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in Biomedical Imaging. New York, VCH Publishers, 1996
2. Wong S, Zaremba L, Gooden D, et al: Radiologic image compression-a review. Proc IEEE 83:194-219, 1995
3. Chen ZD, Chang RF, Kuo WJ: Adaptive predictive multiplicative autoregressive model for medical image compression. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:181-184, 1999
4. Swets JA: ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 14:109-121, 1979
5. Ji TL, Sundareshan MK, Roehrig H: Adaptive image contrast enhancement based on human visual properties. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 13:573-586, 1994
6. Eskicioglu AM, Fisher PS: Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Trans Comm 43:2959-2965, 1995
7. Cosman P, Gray R, Plshen R: Quality evaluation for compressed medical images: fundamentals. In: Bankman IN Eds. Handbook of Medical Imaging Processing and Analysis. Academic Press, New York, 2000, pp 803-819
8. Okkalides D, Efremides S: Quality assessment of DSA, ultrasound and CT digital images compressed with the JPEG protocol. Phys Med Biol 39:1407-1421, 1994
9. Persons K, Palisson P, Manduca A, et al: An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images. J Digit Imaging 10:60-66, 1997
10. Burgul R, Gilbert FJ, Undrill PE: Methods of measurement of image quality in tele-ultrasound. Br J Radiol 73:1306-1312, 2000
11. Good WF, Gur D, Feist JH, et al: Subjective and objective assessment of image quality-a comparison. J Digit Imaging 7:77-78, 1994
12. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, the US Food and Drug Agency. Guidance for the submission of premarket notification for medical image management devices. Washington DC, 2000
13. DeVore R, Jawerth B, Lucier B: Image compression through wavelet transform coding. IEEE Trans Info Theory 38:719-746, 1992
14. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, et al: Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:463-468, 1994
15. Cliff AD, Ord JK: Spatial Process: Methods and Applications. London: Pion, 1981
16. Chuang KS, Liu BJ, Huang HK, et al: Noise content analysis in clinical digital images. Radiographics 14:397-403, 1994
17. Smith I, Roszkowski A, Slaughter R, et al: Acceptable levels of digital image compression in chest radiology. Australas Radiol 44:32-35, 2000
18. Savcenko V, Erickson BJ, Palisson PM, et al: Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression. Radiology 206:609-616, 1998
19. MacMahon H, et al: Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 178:175-179, 1991
20. Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Kijewski PK: Effects of lossy compression on lesion detection: predictions of the nonprewhitening matched filter. Med Phys 25:1621-1624, 1998
21. Kido S, Ikezoe J, Kondoh H, et al: Detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities of the lungs on digital chest radiographs: acceptable data compression ratio. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:111-115, 1996
22. Slone RM, Foos DH, et al: Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Radiology 215:543-553, 2000
23. Cox GG, Cook LT, Insana MP, et al: The effects of lossy compression on the detection of subtle pulmonary nodules. Med Phys 23:127-132, 1996