The Role of Professional Societiesa in Promoting Integrity in Research

American Journal of Health Behavior

Volumn 27, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2003, Pages

  Steneck, Nicholas H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Office of Research Integrity   (United States)

Author keywords

Codes of ethics; Professionalism; Research integrity; Research misconduct

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONFERENCE PAPER; ETHICS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; SOCIETIES, SCIENTIFIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0348147434     PISSN: 10873244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments., National Research Council (U.S.). Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. Office of Research Integrity. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press 2002:5.
2. Office of Research Integrity. Available at: http://grants1.nih.gov/ grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-NS-03-001.html. Accessed Mary 10, 2003.
3. American Academy of Health Behavior. Mission Statement. Available at: http://www.aahb.org/index.htm. Accessed March 10, 2003.
4. American Academy of Health Behavior. Bylaws. Available at: http://www.aahb.org/bylaws.htm. Accessed March 10, 2003.
5. Coalition of National Health Education Organizations. Code of Ethics for the Health Education Profession. Available at: http://hsc.usf.edu/CFH/cnheo/ downloads/code2.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2003.
6. Steneck NH. Assessing the integrity of publicly supported research. In: Steneck NH, Scheetz MD, Eds. Investigating Research Integrity: Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity. Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity 2002:1-16.
7. Office of the President. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Available at: http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/ policies/fed_research_misconduct.asp. Accessed March 10, 2003.
8. Office of Research Integrity. ORI Annual Report. 1994. Available at: http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/publications/annual-reports.asp#2001. Accessed March 10, 2003.
9. National Science Foundation. Office of Inspector General. Semiannual Report to the Congress. Available at: http://www.oig.nsf.gov/pubs.htm. Accessed March 28, 2003.
10. Glick JL. On the potential cost effectiveness of scientific audits. Accountability in Research, 1989;1(1):77-83.
11. Bailey KR. Detecting fabrication of data in a multicenter collaborative animal study. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1991;12(6):741-752.
12. Kalichman MW, Friedman PJ. A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine. 1992;67(11):769-775.
13. Hals A, Jacobsen G. [Misconduct in medical research. A questionnaire survey among project leaders in health region 4]. Nordisk Medicin. 1994;109(3):85-88.
14. Shapiro MF. Data audits in investigational drug trials and their implications for detection of misconduct in science. In: Lock S, Wells F, eds. Fraud and miscondcut in medical research. London: BMJ Publishing Group 1993:128-141.
15. Weiss RB, Vogelzang NJ, Peterson BA, et al. A successful system of scientific data audits for clinical trials. A report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. JAMA. 1993;270(4):459-464.
16. Korenman SG, Berk R, Wenger NS, et al. Evaluation of the research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity. JAMA. 1998;279(1):41-47.
17. Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (U.S.). Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. Responsible science: ensuring the integrity of the research process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1992:28.
18. Evans JT, Nadjari HI, Burchell SA. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1353-1354.
19. Hansen ME, McIntire DD. Reference citations in radiology: accuracy and appropriateness of use in two major journals. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(3):719-723.
20. Asano M, Mikawa K, Nishina K, et al. The accuracy of references in Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1995;50(12):1080-1082.
21. Schulmeister L. Quotation and reference accuracy of three nursing journals. Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(2):143-146.
22. Fenton JE, Brazier H, De Souza A, et al. The accuracy of citation and quotation in otolaryngology/head and neck surgery journals. Clin Otolaryngol. 2000;25(1):40-44.
23. Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A. The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1424-1427.
24. Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL. The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1420-1423.
25. Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR. Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA. 1998;280(3):296-297.
26. Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR, et al. Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Libraries Association. 1999;87(4):437-443.
27. Gardner MJ. An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal. JAMA. 1990;263(March 10):1355-1357.
28. DeMets DL. Statistics and ethics in medical research. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1999;5(1):97-111.
29. Shapiro DW, Wenger NS, Shapiro MF. The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. JAMA. 1994;271(6):438-442.
30. Drenth JP. Authorship inflation: a trend reversed. Lancet. 1995;345(8959):1242-1243.
31. Drenth JP. Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors. JAMA. 1998;280(3):219-221.
32. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280(3):222-224.
33. Hoen WP, Walvoort HC, Overbeke AJ. What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). JAMA. 1998;280(3):217-218.
34. Tarnow E. The authorship list in science: Junior physicists' perceptions of who appears and why. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1999;5(1):73-88.
35. Pitkin RM, Branagan MA. Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280(3):267-269.
36. Pitkin RM, Branagan MA, Burmeister LF. Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. JAMA. 1999;281:1129-1130.
37. Pitkin RM, Branagan MA, Burmeister LF. Effectiveness of a journal intervention to improve abstract quality. JAMA. 2000;283(4):481.
38. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1385-1389.
39. Stewart LA, Parmar MKB. Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? Lancet. 1993;341(842):418-422.
40. Dickersin K. How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Education and Prevention. 1997;9(Suppl 1):15-21.
41. Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, et al. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA. 1998;280(3):254-257.
42. Barnard H, Overbeke AJ. [Duplicate publication of original manuscripts in and from the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. 1993;137(12):593-597.
43. Blancett SS, Flanagin A, Young RK. Duplicate publication in the nursing literature. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1995;27(1):51-56.
44. Tramer MR, Reynolds DJ, Moore RA, et al. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. Br Med J. 1997;315(7109):635-640.
45. Jefferson T. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity? Science and Engineering Ethics. 1998;4(2):135-140.
46. Bloemenkamp DGM, Walvoort HC, Hart W, et al. [Duplicate publication of articles in Dutch Journal of Medicine, 1996]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. 1999;143(43):2150-2153.
47. McCabe DL. Academic dishonesty among high school students. Adolescence. 1999;34(136):681-687.
48. Sekas G, Hutson WR. Misrepresentation of academic accomplishments by applicants for gastroenterology fellowships. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995;123(1):38-41.
49. Gurudevan SV, Mower WR. Misrepresentation of research publications among emergency medicine residency applicants [see comments]. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1996;27(3):327-330.
50. Bilge A, Shugerman RP, Robertson WO. Misrepresentation of authorship by applicants to pediatrics training programs. Academic Medicine. 1998;73(5):532-533.
51. Panicek DM, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, et al. Misrepresentation of publications by applicants for radiology fellowships: is it a problem? American Journal of Roentgenology. 1998;170(3):577-581.
52. Dale JA, Schmitt CM, Crosby LA. Misrepresentation of research criteria by orthopaedic residency applicants. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1999;81(12):1679-1681.
53. Guston DH, Keniston K. The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1994.
54. Steneck NH. Research Ethics and Regulation. Encyclopedia of US Higher Education In Press.
55. Editors ICoMJ. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA. 1993;269:2282-2286.
56. American Anthropological Association. Committee on Ethics. Draft Briefing Papers on Common Dilemmas Faced by Anthropologists Conducting Research in Field Situations. Available at: http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ ethics/ethics.htm. Accessed March 10, 2003.
57. Greenberg JS. The Code of Ethics for the Health Education Profession: A Case Study Book. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers 2001.