CGH analysis in a cohort of 17 chromosomally normal fetuses with an increased nuchal translucency [1]

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1017-1018

  Brisset, Sophie ^a   Romana, Serge ^a   Texier, Isabelle ^a   Lapierre, Jean Michel ^a   North, Marie Odile ^a   Vekemansand, Michel ^a   Morichon Delvallez, Nicole ^a  

^a HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME DELETION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOGENETICS; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRISOMY 13; TRISOMY 18; TRISOMY 21;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; NECK; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, FIRST; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 0348108091     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.677     Document Type: Letter

References (17)

1. Baumann C, Delugarde R, Vuillard E, Oury JF. 2001. Pregnancy outcome and infant follow-up after diagnosis or nuchal anomalies at the 1st or 2nd trimester ultrasound examination. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 30(Suppl. 1): 68-74.
2. Bryndorf T, Kirchhoff M, Rose H, et al. 1995. Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. Am J Hum Genet 57: 1211-1220.
3. Daniely M, Aviram-Goldring A, Barkai G, Goldman B. 1998. Detection of chromosomal aberrations in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 13: 805-809.
4. Joly G, Lapierre JM, Ozilou C, et al. 2001. Comparative genomic hybridisation in mentally retarded patients with dysmorphic features and a normal karyotype. Clin Genet 60: 212-219.
5. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, et al. 1992. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic annlysis of solid tumors. Science 258: 818-821.
6. Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Maahr J, et al. 2000. High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation analysis reveals imbalances in dyschromosomal patients with normal or apparently balanced conventional karyotypes. Eur J Hum Genet 8: 661-668.
7. Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Lundsteen C. 2001. High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics. J Med Genet 38: 740-744.
8. Lapierre JM, Cacheux V, Collot N, et al. 1998. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities. Ann Genet 41: 133-140.
9. Lapierre JM, Sanlaville D, Kang J, et al. 2002. A preliminary study to assess the predictive value of a low-resolution genomic microarray in detecting chromosomal imbalances and DNA copy number polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet, Suppl 71: 306. abstract 784.
10. Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, Mansur C, Marks K. 1992. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J 304: 867-869.
11. Nicolaides KH, Heath V, Cicero S. 2002. Increased fetal nuchal translucency at 11-14 weeks. Prenat Diagn 22: 308-315.
12. Pandya PP, Kondylios A, Hilbert L, Snijders RJ, Nicolaides KH. 1995. Chromosomal defects and outcome in 1015 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5: 15-19.
13. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. 1998. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 20: 207-211.
14. Sanlaville D, Romana SP, Lapierre JM, et al. 2002. A CGH study of 27 patients with CHARGE association. Clin Genet 61: 135-138.
15. Souka AP, Krampl E, Bakalis S, Heath V, Nicolaides KH. 2001. Outcome of pregnancy in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18: 9-17.
16. Thein A, Charles A, Davies T, Newbury-Ecob R, Soothill P. 2001. The role of comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal diagnosis. BJOG 108: 642-648.
17. Veltman JA, Schoenmakers EF, Eussen BH, et al. 2002. High-throughput analysis of subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements by use of array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Am J Hum Genet 70: 1269-1276.