University R&D performance evaluation: The case of the National University of Mexico

Research Evaluation

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 167-177

  López Martínez, Roberto E ^a   Rocha Lackiz, Alma ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348105360     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rev/7.3.167     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. William J Abernathy and James M Utterback (1978), "Patterns of industrial innovation", Technology Review, 80(7), pages 40-47.
2. Frank M Andrews (1979), Scientific Productivity. The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA and UNESCO, Paris).
3. H Arendt (1961), Between Past and Future (The Viking Press, New York).
4. Lewis M Branscom (1992), "Does America need a technology policy?", Harvard Business Review, March-April, pages 24-31.
5. D Allen Bromley (1972), Physics in Perspective (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC).
6. Henri Capron and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (1997), "Public support to R&D programmes: an integrated assessment scheme", in OECD, Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology. Towards Best Practices (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France).
7. N Clark (1987), "Similarities and differences between scientific and technological paradigms", Futures, 19(1), pages 25-42.
8. CONACyT, National Council of Science and Technology (1996), Programa de Ciencia y Tecnología 1995-2000 (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia. Poder Ejecutivo Federal, México).
9. CONACyT, National Council of Science and Technology (editor) (1997), Indicadores de Actividades Cientificas y Tecnológicas 1996. México (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, México).
10. CONACyT, National Council of Science and Technology (1984), Programs Nacional de Desarrollo Tecnológico y Cientifico 84-88 (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. Poder Ejecutivo Federal, México).
11. CTIC (1984), ́Lineamientos generales acerca de la investigación aplicada y el desarrollo tecnológico", in Manual Universitario de Propiedad Industrial (UNAM, México).
12. CTIC (1988), Criterios y Lineamientos para la Evaluación del Personal Académico de los Institutos y Centros de la Investigación Científica (Consejo Técnico de la Investigación Científica, UNAM, México).
13. Robert Dalpé and Élaine Gauthier (1993). "Evaluation of the industrial relevance of public research institutions", Research Evaluation, April, pages 13-54.
14. Derek de Solla Price(1984), "The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation", Research Policy, 13, pages 3-20.
15. Giovanni Dosi (1982), "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change", Research Policy, 11, pages 147-162.
16. Yehuda Elkana, Joshua Lederberg, Robert K Merton, Arnold Thackray and Harriet Zuckerman (1978), Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators, (John Wiley and Sons, a Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York).
17. Wendy Faulkner (1994), "Conceptualizing knowledge used in innovation: a second look at the science-technology distinction and industrial innovation", Science, Technology and Human Values, 19(4), pages 425-458.
18. Eliezer Geisler (1994), "Key output indicators in performance evaluation of research and development organizations", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 47, pages 189-203.
19. Michael Gibbons (1985), "The changing role of the academic research system", in Michael Gibbons and B Wittrock (editors), Science as a Commodity (Longman Group Ltd, Essex).
20. Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow (1994), New Production of Knowledge: Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (SAGE Publications Ltd, London).
21. Hariolf Grupp (1994), "The measurement of technical performance of innovations by technometrics and its impact on established technology indicators", Research Policy, 23, pages 175-193.
22. Paul Hare and Geoffrey Wyatt (1988), "Modelling the determination of research output in British universities", Research Policy, 17, pages 315-328.
23. John Irvine (1988), Evaluating Applied Research (Pinter Publishers Limited, London).
24. Fumio Kodama (1992), "Technology fusion and the new R&D", Harvard Business Review, 1 Jul-31 Aug, pages 70-78.
25. Thomas Kuhn (1982), "Normal measurement and reasonable agreement", in B Barnes and D Edge (editors), Science in Context (Open University Press, Milton Keynes) pages 75-93.
26. R E López-Martínez, E Medellin, A P Scanlon and J L Solleiro (1994), "Motivations and obstacles to university industry cooperation (UIC): a Mexican case", R&D Management, 24(1), pages 17-31.
27. Bengt-Ake Lundvall (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (Pinter Publishers, London).
28. Ben R Martin and John Irvine (1983), "Assessing basic research. Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy", Research Policy, 12, pages 61-90.
29. J Stanley Metcalfe (1993), "Some Lamarckian themes in the theory of growth and economic selection: a provisional analysis", Revue Internationale de Systemique, 7(5), pages 487-504.
30. Richard R Nelson (1993). National Innovation Systems (Oxford University, New York).
31. Richard R Nelson and Sidney G Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Technical Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London).
32. OECD (1980), The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development (Frascati Manual) (OECD, Paris).
33. OECD (1994), Reviews of National Science and Technology Policy. Mexico (OECD, Paris).
34. OECD (1997), Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Oslo Manual (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Eurostat, Paris).
35. Keith Pavitt (1991), "What makes basic research economically useful?", Research Policy, 20, pages 109-119.
36. AJ Phillimore (1989), "University research performance indicators in practice: the University Grants Committee's evaluation of British universities, 1985-86", Research Policy, 18, pages 255-271.
37. A Rip (1988), "Mapping of science: possibilities and limitations", in A F J van Raan (editor), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology (Elsevier Science Publishers BV, North-Holland).
38. Roy Rothwell (1992), "Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s", R&D Management, 22(3), pages 221-239.
39. Devendra Sahal (1985), "Foundations of technometrics", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 27, pages 1-37.
40. J Salomon (1977), "Science policy studies and the development of science policy", I Spiegel-Rosing and D de Solla Price (editors), Science, Technology and Society. A Cross-disciplinary Perspective (SAGE Publishers, London and Beverly Hills).
41. P P Saviotti and J Stanley Metcalfe (1984), "A theoretical approach to the construction of technological output indicators", Research Policy, 13, pages 141-151.
42. SPP (Secretaria de Programación y Presupuesto) and CONACyT (National Council of Science and Technology) (1990), Programa Nacional de Ciencia y Modernización Tecnológica 1990-1994 (Secretaria de Programación y Presupuesto and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México).
43. M J Stahl and J A Steger (1977), "Improving R&D productivity - measuring innovation and productivity, a peer rating approach", 7, Research Management, 20(1), pages 35-38.
44. James M Utterback (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: how Companies can seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).
45. Alvin M Weinberg (1963), "Criteria for scientific choice", Minerva, 1, pages 159-171.
46. Alvin M Weinberg (1989), "Criteria for evaluation, a generation later", in David Evered and Sara Harnett (editors), The Evaluation of Scientific Research (John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, pages 3-15).
47. Bjorn M Werner and William E Souder (1997), "Measuring R&D performance - state of the art", Research Technology Management, 40(2), pages 34-42.