Price discrimination in the international grain trade: The case of Canadian Wheat Board feed barley exports

Agribusiness

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 313-322

  Brooks, Harvey ^a   Schmitz, Troy G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348054245     PISSN: 07424477     EISSN: 15206297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199922)15:3<313::AID-AGR2>3.0.CO;2-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Carter, C.A., (1993a). The economics of a single North American barley market. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 41.
2. Carter, C.A., (1993b). An economic analysis of a single North American barley market, Report submitted to the Associate Deputy Minister, Grains and Oilseeds Branch. Ottawa: Agriculture Canada, March.
3. Carter, C.A., & Loyns, R.M.A., (1996). The economics of single desk selling of western Canadian grains. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development.
4. Carter, C.A., Loyns, A., & Berwald, D., (1998). Domestic costs of the Canadian Wheat Board. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(2).
5. Goodwin, B., & Smith, V.H., (1995, March). Price discrimination in international wheat markets. A report prepared for the Wheat Export Trade Education Committee.
6. Johnson, D., & Wilson, W., (1994). North American barley trade competition. Agricultural Economics Report No. 314, Fargo: North Dakota State University.
7. Kraft, D.F., Furtan, W.H., & E. Tyrchniewicz., . (1996). Performance evaluation of the Canadian wheat board. Winnipeg: Canadian Wheat Board.
8. Office of the US Trade Representative. (1998, December 4). USTR, USDA announce series of new measures to open Canadian farm markets, USTR, Executive Office of the President release #98-107.
9. Schmitz, A., (1996a). Economic performance of the Canadian Wheat Board: Myth and reality, Report submitted to Brian H. Hay, Senior Counsel, Department of Justice, Government of Canada, August.
10. Schmitz, A., (1996b). Rebuttal to the affidavit of Dr. Carter filed in the court case of Archibald et al., V. CWB and HMQ (Federal Court No. T-2473-93), August 17.
11. Schmitz, A., Furtan, H., Brooks, H., & Gray, R., (1997). The Canadian Wheat Board, how well has it performed? CHOICES, 1.
12. Schmitz, T.G., & Gray, R., (1999). State trading enterprises and revenue gains from price discrimination. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Schmitz, A., Gray, R., Schmitz, T.G., & Storey, G., (1997). The CWB and barley marketing: Price pooling and single-desk selling. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Canadian Wheat Board.
14. Schmitz A., Gray, R., & Ulrich, A., (1993). A continental barley market: Where are the gains? University of Saskatchewan: Department of Agricultural Economics.
15. Schmitz, T.G., & Koo, W., (1996). An economic analysis of international feed and malting barley barkets: An econometric spatial oligopolistic approach. Agricultural Economics Report No. 375, North Dakota State University, September.
16. USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service. (1999, January). Grain: World markets and trade. Washington, DC: Circular Series FG 1-99, .
17. US General Accounting Office. (1996). Canada, Australia, and New Zealand: Potential ability of agricultural state trading enterprises to distort trade. Washington, DC, report to Congressional requesters, GAO/NSIAD, 96-94.
18. US General Accounting Office. (1998). US Agricultural Trade: Canadian wheat issues. Washington, DC, report to the Honorable Byron Dorgan, US Senate, GAO/NSIAD, 99-21.
19. US International Trade Commission. (1994). Wheat, wheat flour, and semolina: Investigation no. 22-54. Washington, DC, International Trade Commission, publication 2794.
20. Wilson, W., & Johnson, D., (1995). North American malting barley trade: Impacts of differences in quality and marketing costs. North Dakota State University Agricultural Economics Report, No. 335, Fargo, ND.