History of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine's Efforts to Keep Ultrasound Safe

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1293-1300

  Nyborg, Wesley L ^a  

^a University of Vermont   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NONHUMAN; PUBLICATION; RADIATION RESPONSE; REVIEW; SAFETY; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0348011745     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.12.1293     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Nyborg WL. Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part I: personal histories. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26:911-964.
2. Nyborg WL. Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27:301-333.
3. Lehmann JF. The biophysical mode of action of biologic and therapeutic ultrasonic reactions. J Acoust Soc Am 1953; 25:17-25.
4. Holmes JH. A history of AIUM. Reflections 1980; 6:193-212.
5. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Communication from the AIUM Bioeffects Committee, August 1976. J Clinical Ultrasound 1976; 5:2-4.
6. 2, SPTA)? Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1978.
7. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Evaluation of Research Reports: Bioeffects Literature Reviews (1962-1982). Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1982.
8. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Evaluation of Research Reports: Bioeffects Literature Reviews (1985-1991). Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1991.
9. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Bioeffects considerations for the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7(suppl):S1-S38.
10. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Bioeffects and Safety of Diagnostic Ultrasound. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1993.
11. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19:69-168.
12. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Acoustical Data for Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. Manufacturer's Commendation Panel. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1985.
13. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Acoustical Data for Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. Manufacturer's Commendation Panel. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1987.
14. US Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Guide for Measuring and Reporting Acoustic Output of Diagnostic Ultrasound Medical Devices. Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration; 1985.
15. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Safety Considerations for Diagnostic Ultrasound. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1985.
16. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Recommended Ultrasound Terminology. 2nd ed. Laurel, MD; American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1997.
17. Kremkau FW. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physical Principles and Exercises. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1980.
18. Kremkau FW. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Principles and Instruments. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 2002.
19. US Congress. Public law 94-295. In: United States Statutes at Large. Vol 90. Pt 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1978:539-583.
20. Carson PL, Fischella P, Oughton TV. Ultrasonic power and intensities produced by diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Ultrasound Med Biol 1978; 3:341-350.
21. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Safety standard for diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Publication UL 1-1981. J Ultrasound Med 1983; 2(suppl):S1-S49.
22. Stratmeyer ME. FDA model for regulatory purposes. Ultrasound Med Biol 1989; 15(suppl 1):35-36.
23. National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements. Exposure Criteria for Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound, I: Criteria Based on Thermal Mechanisms. Bethesda, MD: National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements Publications; 1992. Report 113.
24. Nyborg WL. Physical mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound. Rockville, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 1978. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare publication (FDA) 78-8062.
25. Carstensen EL, Child SZ, Norton S, Nyborg WL. Ultrasonic heating of the skull. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87:1310-1317.
26. Drewniak JL, Carnes KI, Dunn F. In vitro ultrasonic heating of fetal bone. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86:1254-1258.
27. Child SZ, Hartman CL, Schery LA, Carstensen EL. Lung damage from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16:817-825.
28. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Standard for Real-Time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1992.
29. Apfel RE, Holland CK. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse low-duty-cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17:179-185.
30. US Food and Drug Administration. Revised 910(k) Guidance for Diagnostic Ultrasound for 1993: Communication from F. A. Andersen. Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration; 1993.
31. US Food and Drug Administration. Information for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers. Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration; 1997.
32. Abbott JG. Rationale and derivation of MI and TI: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25:431-441.
33. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Medical Ultrasound Safety. Laurel, MD: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 1994.
34. Carson PL (ed). Effects of nonlinear ultrasound propagation on output display indices. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:27-86.
35. National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements Exposure Criteria for Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound, II: Criteria Based on All Known Mechanisms. Bethesda, MD: National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements Publications; 2002. Report 140.