Work Attendance Despite Headache and Its Economic Impact: A Comparison between Two Workplaces

Headache

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1097-1101

  Raak, Ragnhild ^a   Raak, Anders ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SAAB Aerospace   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Gender; Headache; Indirect costs; Stress; Workplace setting

Indexed keywords

ABSENTEEISM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ECONOMICS; EMPLOYEE; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEADACHE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOB PERFORMANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; STRESS; SWEDEN; TECHNOLOGY; WORKPLACE;

ABSENTEEISM; ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; COST OF ILLNESS; EFFICIENCY; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PREVALENCE; SWEDEN; WORKPLACE;

EID: 0348011661     PISSN: 00178748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03212.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Stewart W, Celentano D, Ziegler D, Sprecher M. An epidemiologic study of headache among adolescents and young adults. JAMA. 1989;21:221-226.
2. Schwartz BS, Stewert WF, Lipton RB. Lost workdays and decreased work effectiveness associated with headache in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39:320-327.
3. Antonov K, Isacson D. Headache in Sweden: the importance of working conditions. Headache. 1997;37:228-234.
4. Kryst S, Scherl E. A population-based survey of the social and personal impact of headache. Headache. 1994;34:344-350.
5. Lipton R, Stewart W, Von Korff M. The burden of migraine. A review of costs to society. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994;28:215-221.
6. Evans K, Boan J, Evans J, A. S. Economic evaluation of oral sumatriptan compared with oral caffeine/ergotamine for migraine. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997;12:565-577.
7. Von Korff M, Stewart WF, Simon DJ, Lipton RB. Migraine and reduced work performance: a population-based diary study. Neurology. 1998;50:1741-1745.
8. Stang P, Osterhaus J. Impact of migraine in the United States: data from the National Health Interview Survey. Headache. 1993;33:.
9. Stewart W, Lipton R, Simon D. Work-related disability: results from the American migraine study. Cephalalgia. 1996;16:231-238.
10. Pop P, Gierveld C, Karis H, Tiedink G. Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9:171-174.
11. Rasmussen B, Jensen R, Olesen J. Impact of headache on sickness and utilisation of medical service: a Danish population study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992;46:443-446.
12. Göbel H, Buschman P, Heinze A, Heinze-Kuhn K. Epidemiology and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Versicherungsmedizin. 2000;52:19-23.
13. Silberstein S, Lipton R, Goadsby P, Smith R. Headache in Primary Care. Oxford: Isis Medical Media Ltd; 1999.
14. Arnetz B. Psychosocial challenges facing physicians of today. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:203-213.
15. Raak R, Wahren L. Stress coping strategies in thermal pain-sensitive and insensitive healthy subjects. Int J Nurs Pract. 2001;7:162-168.
16. Gilbar O, Bazak Y, Harel Y. Gender, primary headache, and psychological distress. Headache. 1998;38:31-34.
17. Trask P, Iezzi T, Kreeft J. Comparison of headache parameters using headache type and emotional status. J Psychosom Res. 2001;51:529-536.
18. Holroyd K, France J, Nash J, Hursey K. Pain state as artifact in the psychosocial assessment of recurrent headache sufferers. Pain. 1993;21:1138-1143.