Psychological Reactions to Adaptive Testing

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 7-15

  Tonidandel, Scott ^a   Quiñones, Miguel A ^b  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348000694     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2389.00126     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arvey, R.D. and Sackett, P.R. (1993) Fairness in selection: Current developments and perspectives. In N. Schmitt and W. Borman (eds.) Personnel Selection (pp. 171-202). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Chan, D., Schmitt, N., DeShon, R.P., Clause, C.S., and Delbridge, K. (1997) Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationship between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 300-310.
3. Chan, D., Schmitt, N., Jennings, D., Clause, C.S. and Delbridge, K. (1998) Applicant perceptions of test fairness: Integrating justice and self-serving bias perspectives. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
4. Gilliland, S.W. (1993) The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 694-734.
5. Gilliland, S.W. (1994) Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 691-701.
6. Konovsky, M.A. and Cropanzano, R. (1991) Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 598-707.
7. Kravitz, D.A., Stinson, V. and Chavez, T.L. (1996) Evaluations of tests used for making selection and promotion decisions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 4(1) 24-34.
8. Legg, S.M. and Buhr, D.C. (1992) Computerized adaptive testing with different groups. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11, 23-27.
9. Linden, R.C. and Parsons, C.K. (1986) A field study of job applicant interview perceptions, alternative opportunities, and demographic characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 39, 109-122.
10. Lunz, M.E. et al. (1991) The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education.
11. Lunz, M.E., Bergstrom, B.A. and Gershon, R.C. (1994) Computer adaptive testing. International Journal of Educational Research, 6, 623-634.
12. Macan, T.H., Avedon, M.J., Paese, M. and Smith, D.E. (1994) The effects of applicants' reactions to cognitive ability tests and an assessment center. Personnel Psychology, 47, 715-738.
13. Moe, K.C. and Johnson, M.F. (1988) Participants' reactions to computerized testing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 79-86.
14. Mostrangelo, P.M. (1997) Do college students still prefer companies without employment drug testing? Journal of Business and Psychology, 11(3), 325-337.
15. Overton, R.C., Harms, H.J., Taylor, L.R. and Zickar, M.J. (1997) Adapting to adaptive testing. Personnel Psychology, 50, 171-185.
16. Rynes, S.L. and Connerly, M.L. (1993) Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7 (3), 261-277.
17. Rynes, S.L., Heneman, H.G. and Schwab, D.P. (1980) Individual reactions to organizational recruiting: A review. Personnel Psychology, 33, 529-542.
18. Schmidt, F.L., Urry, V.W. and Gugel, J.F. (1978) Computer assisted tailored testing: Examinee reactions and evaluations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 265-273.
19. Smither, J.W., Millsap, R.E., Stoffey, R.W., Reilly, R.R. and Pearlman K. (1996) An experimental test of the influence of selection procedures on fairness perceptions attitudes about the organization and job pursuit intentions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 297-318.
20. Smither, J.W., Reilly, R.R., Millsap, R.E., Pearlman, K. and Stoffey, R.W. (1993) Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49-76.
21. Stocking, M.L. (1996) An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.
22. Stone, G.E. and Lunz, M.E. (1994) The effects of review on the psychometric characteristics of computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 211-222.
23. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (1989) Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
24. Vispoel, W.P. et al. (1992) How review options and administration mode influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
25. Vispoel, W.P., Rocklin, T.R. and Wang, T. (1994) Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computer-adaptive, and self-adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 3-79.
26. Wainer, H. (ed). (1990) Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Wise, S.L. (1997) Overview of Practical Issues in a CAT Program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.