|
Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 32-37
|
Comparison between bupivacaine 0.125% and ropivacaine 0.2% for epidural administration to outpatients with chronic low back pain
|
Author keywords
Anaesthesia, Conduction, nerve block; Anaesthesia, epidural; Anaesthetics, Local, bupivacaine, ropivacaine; Back Pain, low back pain; Injections, epidural; Physical Therapy
|
Indexed keywords
BUPIVACAINE;
PLACEBO;
ROPIVACAINE;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DRUG EFFECT;
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA;
FEMALE;
HEADACHE;
HEMODYNAMICS;
HUMAN;
LOW BACK PAIN;
MALE;
MOTOR NERVE BLOCK;
NERVE BLOCK;
OUTPATIENT;
PHYSIOTHERAPY;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SIDE EFFECT;
VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;
ADULT;
AGED;
AMIDES;
ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL;
ANESTHETICS, LOCAL;
BUPIVACAINE;
COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES;
HUMANS;
LOW BACK PAIN;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES;
|
EID: 0347993944
PISSN: 02650215
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021504001061 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (12)
|