Use of a Curriculum-Based Measure to Corroborate Eligibility Decisions

Journal of Early Intervention

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 20-30

  Bricker, Diane ^a   Yovanoff, Paul ^a   Capt, Betty ^a   Allen, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CURRICULUM; DATA ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0347991739     PISSN: 10538151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105381510302600102     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bagnato, S., Neisworth, J., & Munson, S. (1997). Linking assessment and early intervention: An authentic curriculum-based approach. Baltimore: Brookes.
2. Baker, F. (1992). Item response theory: Estimation techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
3. Bricker, D. (Ed.). (1993). Assessment, evaluation, and programming system for infants and children. Baltimore: Brookes.
4. nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
5. Bricker, D., & Pretti-Frontczak, K. (1996). Assessment, evaluation, and programming system for infants and children: Vol. 3. AEPS measurement for three to six years. Baltimore: Brookes.
6. Cizek, G. (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts and methods. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
7. Danaher, J. (2001). Eligibility policies and practices for young children under Part B of IDEA (NECTAS Notes No. 9). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.
8. Embretson, S., & Reise, S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Hambleton, R. (1998). Enhancing the validity of HAEP achievement level score reporting. Proceedings of achievement levels workshop (pp. 77-98). Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
11. Holland, P., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.
13. Kolen, M., Zeng, L., & Hanson, B. (1996). Conditional standard errors of measurement for scale scores using IRT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 129-140.
14. Linacre, M. (2002). Winsteps (Version 3.5) [Computer software]. Chicago: Mesa Press.
15. Linacre, M., & Wright, B. (1989). Equivalence of Prox and Mantel-Haenszel. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 3(2), 51-55.
16. Lord, F. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Bricker, D. (2000). Enhancing the quality of IEP goals and objectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 92-105.
19. Rasch, G. (1960; reprinted 1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Reckase, M. (1998). Converting boundaries between National Assessment Governing Board performance categories to points on the National Assessment of Educational Progress score scale: The 1996 science NAEP process. Applied Measurement in Education, 11, 9-11.
21. Shakelford, J. (2002). State and jurisdictional eligibility definitions for infants and toddlers with disabilities under IDEA (NECTAS Notes No. II). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.