Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 199-204

  Jun Seongsook, R N ^a   Jeong Ihnsook, R N ^a   Lee Younghee, R N ^a  

^a Pusan National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Pressure ulcers; Risk assessment; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BRADEN SCALE; CALCULATION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUBBIN SCALE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DECUBITUS; DOUGLAS SCALE; FEMALE; FRICTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMIDITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENT; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; JACKSON SCALE; KOREA; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PREDICTION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; ROC CURVE; SENSATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; STANDARD; ULCER; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0347985652     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00135-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beckmann J.D. Nursing Malpractice. Implication for Clinical Practice and Nursing Education:1995;University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
2. Bergman-Evans B., Cuddigan J., Bergstrom N. Clinical practice guidelines. prediction and prevention of pressure ulcers Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 20(9):1994;19-26.
3. Bergstrom N., Braden B.J., Laguzza A., Holman V. The Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nursing Research. 36(4):1987;205-210.
4. Braden B.J., Bergstrom N. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population. Research in Nursing and Health. 17:1994;459-479.
5. Bridel J. Assessing the risk of pressure sores. Nursing Standard. 10(7):1993;32-35.
6. Cubbin B., Jackson C. Trial of a pressure ulcer risk calculator for intensive care patients. Intensive Care Nursing. 7(1):1991;40-44.
7. Goodridge D.M., Sloan J.A., Lenoyean Y.M., Mckenzie J.A., Knight W.E., Gayari C. Risk-assessment scores, prevention strategies, and the incidence of pressure ulcers among the eldery in four canadian health-care facilities. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 30(2):1998;23-44.
8. Kim Y.K. Identification of pressure ulcer risk factors. Nursing Science. 8(1):1996;28-48.
9. Kim Y.K. Evaluation of predictive validity for the pressure ulcer risk assessment tool. Nursing Science. 10(2):1998;1-11.
10. Kim, J.Y., 1999. Development of Questionnaire on the Job-related Musculoskeletal Disease Using ROC Analysis Method. Dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
11. Larson E. Evaluating validity of screening tests. Nursing Research. 35:1986;186-191.
12. Lyder C.H., Yu C., Emerling J., Mangat R., Stevenson D., Frazier O.E., Mckay J. The Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk. evaluating the predictive validity in black and latino/hispanic elders Applied Nursing Research. 12(2):1999;60-68.
13. Metz C.E. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 8(4):1978;283-298.
14. Morasso G.et al. Assessing psychological distress in cancer patients. validation of a self-administered questionnaire Oncology. 53:1996;295-302.
15. Moses L.E., Shapiro D. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic tests into a summary ROC curve. data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations Statistics in Medicine. 12:1993;1293-1316.
16. Panel for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, 1994. Treatment of pressure ulcers. Clinical practice guideline, no. 15 (AHCRP Publication No. 95-0652. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services).
17. Prichard V. Calculating the risk. Nursing Times. 2(19):1986;59-61.
18. Samantha M.P., Thomas K.W. Predicting pressure sore risk with the Norton, Braden, and Waterlow scales in a Hong Kong rehabilitation hospital. Nursing Research. 47(3):1998;147-153.
19. Schulte, P.A., Perera, F.P., 1993. Validation in Molecular Epidemiology: Principles and Practices. Academic Press, New York, pp. 79-107.
20. Towey A.P., Erland S.M. Validity and reliability of an assessment tool for pressure ulcer risk. Decubitus. 1(2):1998;40-48.
21. Zimmerman J.E., Wagner D.P., Draper E.A., Wright L., Alzola C. Evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III predictions of hospital mortality in an independent database. Critical Care Medicine. 26(8):1998;1317-1326.
22. Zweig M.H., Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots. a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine Clinical Chemistry. 39(4):1993;561-577.