Computation of differential seismograms and iteration adaptive regularization in prestack waveform inversion

Geophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 2026-2039

  Sen, Mrinal K ^a   Roy, Indrajit G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA REDUCTION; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; ACOUSTIC WAVE REFLECTION; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; GRADIENT METHODS; JACOBIAN MATRICES; PRODUCT DESIGN; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

SEISMIC WAVEFORM INVERSION; SEISMOGRAMS; ADAPTIVE ESTIMATION; ADAPTIVE REGULARIZATION; COMPUTATION ALGORITHM; COMPUTATIONAL STABILITY; GENERALIZED CROSS VALIDATION; GEOPHYSICS COMPUTING; SENSITIVITY COMPUTATION;

SEISMOLOGY; INVERSE PROBLEMS;

DATA INVERSION; DATA PROCESSING; PRESTACK MIGRATION; SEISMIC DATA; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

EID: 0347985607     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1635056     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aki, K., and Richards, P. G., 1980, Quantitative seismology: W. H. Freeman and Co.
2. Backus, G. E., and Gilbert, F., 1968, The resolving power of gross earth data: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 16, 169-205.
3. Belge, M., Kilmer, M. E., and Miller, E. L., 1998, Simultaneous multiple regularization parameters selection by means of L-hypersurface with application to linear inverse problems posed in the wavelet transform domain: Proc. SPIE, 3459, 328-336.
4. Castagna, J., and Backus, M. M., 1993, Offset dependent reflectivity: Theory and Practice of AVO analysis: Soc. Expl. Geophys.
5. Craven, P., and Wahba, G., 1979, Smoothing noisy data with spline functions: Estimating correct degree of smoothing by the method of generalized cross-validation: Numerische Mathematik, 31, 377-403.
6. Dembo, R. S., Eisenstat, S. C., and Steihaug, T., 1982, Inexact Newton methods: SIAM J. Num. Anal., 19, 400-408.
7. Dunkin, J. W., 1965, Computation of modal solutions in layered elastic media at high frequencies: Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 55, 335-338.
8. Engl, H. W., 1987, Discrepancy principles of Tikhonov regularization of ill-posed problems leading to optimal convergence rates: J. Optim. Theo. Appl., 52, 209-215.
9. Farquharson, C., and Oldenburg, D., 2000, Automatic estimation of the trade-off parameter in nonlinear inverse problems using the GCV and L-curve criteria: 70th Ann. Internat. Mtg: Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 265-268.
10. Gilbert, F., and Backus, G. E., 1966, Propagator matrices in elastic wave and vibration problems: Geophysics, 31, 326-332.
11. Girard, D., 1989, A fast Monte-Carlo cross validation procedure for large least squares problems with noisy data: Numerische Mathematik, 56, 1-23.
12. Haber, E., and Oldenburg, D. W., 2000, A GCV based method for nonlinear ill-posed problems: Comp. Geosci., 4, 41-63.
13. Hanke, M., 1997, Regularizing properties of a truncated Newton-CG algorithm for nonlinear inverse problems: Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 18, 971-993.
14. Hansen, P. C., 1992, Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of L-curve: SIAM Review, 34, 561-580.
15. Hansen, P. C., 2001, The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems, in Johnston, P. Ed., Computational inverse problems in electrocardiology: WIT Press, 119-142.
16. Hansen, P. C., and O'Leary, D. P., 1993, The use of L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems: SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 14, 1487-1503.
17. Hutchinson, M. F., 1989, A stochastic estimator of the trace of the influence matrix of Laplacian smoothing splines: Comm. Stat. Simul. Comp., 18, 1059-1076.
18. Ingber, L., 1989, Very fast simulated annealing: Math. Comp. Modeling, 12, 967-993.
19. Jensen, F. B., Kuperman, W. A., Porter, M. B., and Schmidt, H., 1996, Computational ocean acoustics: AIP Press.
20. Kennett, B. L. N., 1983, Seismic wave propagation in stratified media: Cambridge Univ. Press.
21. Kormendi, F., and Dietrich, M., 1991, Nonlinear waveform inversion of plane-wave seismograms in stratified elastic media: Geophysics. 56, 664-674.
22. Ma, X. Q., 2002, Simultaneous inversion of prestack seismic data for rock properties using simulated annealing: Geophysics, 67, 1877-1885.
23. Mallick, S., 1999, Some practical aspects of prestack waveform inversion using a genetic algorithm: An example from the east Texas Woodbine gas sands: Geophysics, 64, 326-336.
24. Mallick, S., and Frazer, L. N., 1987, Practical aspects of reflectivity modeling: Geophysics, 52, 1355-1364.
25. Mallick, S., 1988, Rapid computation of multioffset vertical seismic profile synthetic seismograms for layered media: Geophysics, 53, 479-491.
26. McAuley, A., 1985, Prestack inversion with plane layer point source modeling: Geophysics, 50, 77-89.
27. Minkoff, S. E., and Symes, W. W., 1997, Full waveform inversion of marine reflection data in the plane-wave domain: Geophysics, 62, 540-553.
28. Morozov, V. A., 1986, Methods for solving incorrectly posed problems: Springer-Verlag.
29. Nash, S. G., 2000, A survey of truncated Newton methods: J. Comp. Appl. Math., 124, 45-59.
30. Neumaier, A., 1998, Solving ill-conditioned and singular linear systems-A tutorial on regularization: SIAM Review, 40, 636-666.
31. Pan, G. S., and Phinney, R. A., 1989, Full-waveform inversion of plane wave seismograms in stratified acoustic media: Applicability and limitations: Geophysics, 54, 368-380.
32. Pan, G. S., Young, C. Y., and Castagna, J. P., 1994, An integrated target-oriented prestack elastic waveform inversion: Geophysics, 59, 1392-1404.
33. Phinney, R. A., Odom, R. I., and Fryer, G. J., 1987, Rapid generation of synthetic seismograms in layered media by vectorization of the algorithm: Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 77, 2218-2226.
34. Pratt, R. G., Shin, C., and Hicks, G., 1998, Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion: Geophys. J. Internat., 133, 341-362.
35. Ramlau, R., 2002, A steepest descent algorithm for the global minimization of Tikhonov functional: Inverse Problems. 18, 381-403.
36. Randall, G. E., 1989, Efficient calculation of differential seismograms for lithospheric receiver functions: Geophys. J. Internat, 99, 469-481.
37. Reginska, T., 1996, A regularization parameter in discrete ill-posed problems: SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 17, 740-749.
38. Roy, I. G., 2002, A robust descent type algorithm for geophysical inversion through adaptive regularization: Appl. Math. Model., 26, 619-634.
39. Roy, I. G., Sen, M. K., Torres-Verdin, C., and Varela, O. J., 2002, Prestack inversion of Gulf of Thailand OBC data: 72nd Internat. Ann. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 914-917.
40. Schmidt, H., and Tango, G., 1986, Efficient global matrix approach to the computation of synthetic seismograms: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 84, 331-359.
41. Sen, M. K., and Stoffa, P. L., 1991, Nonlinear one-dimensional seismic waveform inversion using simulated annealing: Geophysics, 56, 1624-1638.
42. Sen, M. K., 1995, Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion: Elsevier Science Publ. Co.
43. Stoffa, P. L., and Sen, M. K., 1991, Nonlinear multiparameter optimization using genetic algorithms: Inversion of plane wave seismograms: Geophysics, 56, 1794-1810.
44. Symes, W. W., and Carazzone, J. J., 1991, Velocity inversion by differential semblance optimization: Geophysics, 56, 654-663.
45. Takeuchi, H., and Saito, M., 1972, Seismic surface waves, in Bolt, B. A., Ed., Methods of computational physics: Academic Press.
46. Tarantola, A., 1987, Inverse problem theory: Methods of data fitting and model parameter estimation: Elsevier Science Publ. Co.
47. Tikhonov, A. N., and Arsenin, V. Y., 1977, Solutions of ill-posed problems: W. H. Winston.
48. van Wijk, K., Scales, J. A., Navidi, W., and Tenorio, L., 2002, Data and model undertainty estimation for linear inversion: Geophys. J. Internat., 149, 625-632.
49. Wahba, G., 1990, Spline models for observational data: Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.
50. Xia, G., Sen, M. K., and Stoffa, P. L., 1998, 1-D elastic waveform inversion: A divide-and-conquer approach: Geophysics, 63, 1670-1684.