Participatory learning: A Swedish perspective

Heart

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 113-116

  Kiessling, Anna ^a  

^a DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY; CONTINUING EDUCATION; DISEASE COURSE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LEARNING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; MOTIVATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SECONDARY PREVENTION; SWEDEN;

EID: 0347951000     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heart.90.1.113     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events. Lancet 2001;357:995-1001.
2. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458-65.
3. Fuat A, Hungin AP, Murphy JJ. Barriers to accurate diagnosis and effective management of heart failure in primary care: qualitative study. BMJ 2003;326:196. ▶ A qualitative study which identifies barriers to be overcome between primary and secondary care, in order to shape the practice and decision making processes in primary care.
4. Wood D. Guidelines and global risk: a European perspective. Eur Heart J 2002;4(suppl F):F12-18.
5. Kiessling A, Henriksson P. Efficacy of case method learning in general practice for secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: randomised controlled study. BMJ 2002;325:877-80. ▶ Significant effects at patient level are shown in this educational randomised controlled trial. The pedagogical method includes participation, interaction, recurrence, and a locally well known facilitator.
6. Fairhurst K, Huby G. From trial data to practical knowledge: qualitative study of how general practitioners have accessed and used evidence about statin drugs in their management of hypercholesterolaemia. BMJ 1998;317:1130-4.
7. Kaufman DR, Kushniruk AW, Yale JF, et al. Conceptual knowledge and decision strategies in relation to hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease. Int J Med Inf 1999;55:159-77.
8. Tversky A, Kohneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211:453-8. ▶ A landmark presentation of the great impact of the framing of a decision both for the evaluation of compound outcomes and for the psychology of choice.
9. Hunter K. "Don't think zebras": uncertainty, interpretation, and the place of paradox in clinical education. Theor Med 1996;17:225-41.
10. Dowie J. The research-practice gop and the role of decision analysis in closing it. Health Care Anal 1996;4:5-18. ▶ The author states that the mismatch between judgement and decision processes of practitioners and researchers are one important reason for the research-practice gap.
11. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268:2420-5.
12. Leenders MR, Mauffette-Leenders LA, Erskine JA. Writing cases, 4th ed. London, Ontario: Research and Publications Division School of Business Administration University of Western Ontario, 2001.
13. Mauffette-Leenders LA, Erskine JA, Leenders MR, Richard Ivey School of Business. Learning with cases. London, Ontario: Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, 1997. ▶ A comprehensive and practical book, which describes the case method learning technique.
14. Antonovsky A. Health, stress, and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
15. Hutchinson L. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ 1999;318:1267-9. ▶ An excellent review regarding evaluation of educational research. The article describes the complexity of the design and evaluation subject, and the need for evidence base and meaningful outcome measures.
16. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Investigators. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study (4S). Lancet 1994;344:1383-9.
17. Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF, Bennett JH. Becoming a medical information master: feeling good about not knowing everything. J Fam Pract 1994;38:505-13.
18. O'Brien T, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Systematic Revue 2001;(2):CD003030. ▶ An excellent overview of the evidence base for different continuous medical education methods.
19. Davis D, O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, et al. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 1999;282:867-74.
20. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, et al. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ 1998;317:465-8.
21. Lomas J, Enkin M, Anderson GM, et al. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. JAMA 1991;265:2202-7.
22. Jones R, Higgs R, de Angelis C, et al. Changing face of medical curricula. Lancet 2001;357:699-703.
23. Gove PB, Merriam-Webster Inc. Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language, unabridged: a Merriam Webster. Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster, 1986.
24. GISSI-2 Investigators. GISSI-2: a factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus na heparin among 12,490 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Gruppa Italiano per lo studio della sopravvivenza nell'infarto miocardico. Lancet 1990;336:65-71.
25. Stenestrand U, Wallentin L. Early revascularisation and 1-year survival in 14-day survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2002;359:1805-11.