Open access publishing takes off

British Medical Journal

Volumn 328, Issue 7430, 2004, Pages 1-3

  Delamothe, Tony ^a   Smith, Richard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ELECTRONICS; HEALTH ECONOMICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 0347949543     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.1     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Turner N. PLOS Biology. BMJ 2004;328:56.
2. Brown PO, Eisen MB, Varmus HE. Why PloS became a publisher. PLoS Biol 2003 October;1(1):e36 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000036
3. Delamothe T, Godlee F, Smith R. Scientific literature's open sesame? BMJ 2003;326;945-6.
4. Goldsmith C, Larsen K. Reed Elsevier's net jumped on solid subscription sales. Wall Street Journal Online 21 February 2003 (accessed 22 Dec 2003).
5. Gooden P, Owen M, Simon S, Singlehurst L. Scientific publishing: knowledge is power.www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/morganstanley.pdf (accessed 19 Dec 2003).
6. Economic analysis of scientific research publishing: a report commissioned by the Wellcome Trust. London: Wellcome, 2003. www.wellcome.ac.uk/ scipublishing (accessed 22 Dec 2003).
7. Velterop J. Public funding, public knowledge, publication. Serials 2003;16:169-74. www.uksg.org/serials.asp (accessed 22 Dec 2003).
8. Butler D. Who will pay for open access? Nature 2003;425:554-5.