Culturing of avian embryos for time-lapse imaging

BioTechniques

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 274-278

  Rupp, Paul A ^b   Rongish, Brenda J ^d   Czirok, Andras ^b,c   Little, Charles D ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; FLUORESCENCE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

CELL BIOLOGISTS;

BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO; ENVIRONMENT; FOWL; IMAGING; MAMMAL; MICROSCOPY; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AVES; GALLIFORMES; MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0347928669     PISSN: 07366205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2144/03342st01     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Burglin, T.R. 2000. A two-channel four-dimensional image recording and viewing system with automatic drift correction. J. Microsc. 200:75-80.
2. Chapman, S.C., J. Collignon, G.C. Schoenwolf, and A. Lumsden. 2001. Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier. Dev. Dyn. 220:284-289.
3. Cooper, M.S., L.A. D'Amico, and C.A. Henry. 1999. Confocal microscopic analysis of morphogenetic movements. Methods Cell Biol. 59:179-204.
4. Czirok, A., P.A. Rupp, B.J. Rongish, and C.D. Little. 2002. Multi-field 3D scanning light microscopy of early embryogenesis. J. Microsc. 206:209-217.
5. Davidson, L.A., B.G. Hoffstrom, R. Keller, and D.W. DeSimone. 2002. Mesendoderm extension and mantle closure in Xenopus laevis gastrulation: combined roles for integrin α(5)β(1), fibronectin, and tissue geometry. Dev. Biol. 242:109-129.
6. Drake, C.J., L.A. Davis, and C.D. Little. 1992. Antibodies to β 1-integrins cause alterations of aortic vasculogenesis, in vivo. Dev. Dyn. 193:83-91.
7. Hamburger, V. and H.L. Hamilton. 1992. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Dev. Dyn. 195:231-272.
8. Isogai, S., M. Horiguchi, and B.M. Weinstein. 2001. The vascular anatomy of the developing zebrafish: an atlas of embryonic and early larval development. Dev. Biol. 230:278-301.
9. Kulesa, P.M. and S.E. Fraser. 1999. Confocal imaging of living cells in intact embryos. Methods Mol. Biol. 122:205-222.
10. Kulesa, P.M. and S.E. Fraser. 2000. In ovo time-lapse analysis of chick hindbrain neural crest cell migration shows cell interactions during migration to the branchial arches. Development 127:1161-1172.
11. Little, C.D. and C.J. Drake. 2000. Wholemount immunolabeling of embryos by microinjection. Increased detection levels of extracellular and cell surface epitopes. Methods Mol. Biol. 135:183-189.
12. New, D.A.T. 1955. A new technique for the cultivation of the chick embryo in vitro. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 3:326-331.
13. Schnabel, R., H. Hutter, D. Moerman, and H. Schnabel. 1997. Assessing normal embryogenesis in Caenorhabdilis elegans using a 4D microscope: variability of development and regional specification. Dev. Biol. 184:234-265.
14. Stockdale, F.E., W. Nikovits, Jr., and B. Christ. 2000. Molecular and cellular biology of avian somite development. Dev. Dyn. 219:304-321.
15. Thomas, C., P. DeVries, J. Hardin, and J. White. 1996. Four-dimensional imaging: computer visualization of 3D movements in living specimens. Science 273:603-607.