Comparing Individual Attitudes in Seven Countries

Social Science Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-35

  Kamano, Saori ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF POPULATION AND SOCIAL SECURITY RESEARCH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347875037     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ssre.1998.0630     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Boli-Bennett, J. 1976, The expansion of nation-states, 1870-1970, Stanford University.
2. Bean C., Papadakis E. Polorized priorities and flexible alternatives: Response to Inglehart and Hellevik. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 6:1994;295-297.
3. Finifter A. W. Alienation and the Social System. 1972;Wiley.
4. Geyer F. R. Alienation Theories: A General Systems Approach. 1980;Pergamon Press, Oxford.
5. Gundelach P. National Value Differences: Modernization of Institutionalization. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. XXXV:1994;37-58.
6. Hayashi C. Nihonjin no Kokuminsei (Japanese National Character). Tokei Suuri. 40:1992;227-234.
7. Hayashi C. Nihonjin no Kokuminsei (Japanese National Character). Phase. 93:1993;64-96.
8. Hellevik O. Measuring cultural orientation: Rating versus ranking. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 6:1994;292-295.
9. Horowitz I. L. Tradition, modernity and industrialization: Toward an integrated developmental paradigm. Tradition and Modernity: the Role of Traditionalism in the Modernization Process. 1982;University Press of America, Washington. p. 23-34.
10. Inglehart R. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. 1977;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
11. Inglehart R. Culture Shift in Advanced Industral Society. 1990;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
12. Inglehart R. Polorized priorities or flexible alternatives? Dimensionality in Inglehart's materialism-postmaterialism scale: A comment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 6:1994;289-294.
13. Inkeles A., Diamond L. Personal development and national development: A cross-national perspective. Szalai A., Andrews F. M. The Quality of Life: Comparative Studies. 1980;73-109 Sage, London/Beverly Hills.
14. Inkeles A., Leiderman H. An approach to the study of psychosocial maturity: The development of a cross-national scale for adolescents. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 39:1998;52.
15. Inkeles A., Smith D. H. Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries. 1974.
16. Research Report General Series. 1995.
17. Research Report General Series. 1992.
18. Khor, D. 1994, Incorporation of women into the public sphere: A inquiry into the cross-national patterns, antecedents and consequences, Stanford University.
19. Khor D. Shared committment, divergent demands: Conceptualizing and understanding cross-national differences in orientations of feminist organizations. International Review of Sociology. 7:1997;197-220.
20. Meyer J. World polity and authority of the nation-state. Bergesen A. Studies of the Modern World-System. 1980;109-137 Academic Press, New York.
21. Meyer J. W., Ramirez F. O., Walker H. A., Langton N., O'Connor S. M. The state and the institutionalization of relations between women and children. Dornbusch S., Strober M. Feminism, Children, and the New Families. 1988;137-158 Guildford Press, New York.
22. Minami H. Nihonjinron: Meiji kara Konnichi made (Theories on Japanese: From Meiji Period to Today). 1994;Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo.
23. Putnum R. D. The Beliefs of Politicians: Ideology, Conflict, and Democracy in Britain and Italy. 1973;Yale University Press, New Haven/London.
24. Reddy M. A. 1994 Statistical Abstract of the World. 1994;Gale Research Inc. Detroit.
25. Safran W. The French Polity. 1977.
26. Sanders I. T., Whitaker R. Tradition and modernization: The case of Bulgaria. Lutz J., El-Shakhs Salah. Tradition and Modernity: The Role of Traditionalism in the Modernization Process. 1982;147-163 University Press of America, Washington.
27. Sasaki M., Suzuki T. Changes in religious commitment in the United States, Holland, and Japan. American Journal of Sociology. 92:1987;1055-1076.
28. Seeman. On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review. 24:1959;6.
29. Shils Edward. Ideology and civility: On the politics of the intellectual. Sewanee Review. 66:1958;452.
30. Solomon E. S., Bouchouchi N., Denisov V., Hankiss E., Mallmann C. A., Milbrath L. W. UNESCO's policy-relevant quality of life research program. Szalai A., Andrews F. M. The Quality of Life: Comparative Studies. 1990;223-234.
31. Stepan A. State power and the strength of civil society in the southern cone of Latin America. Evans P., Rueschemeyer D., Skocpol T. Bringing the State Back In. 1985;Cambridge University Press, New York.
32. 1992 Statistical Yearbook. 1994;United Nations.
33. Urick R. V. Alienation: Individual or Social Problem. 1977;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
34. Yoshino R. Superculture as a frame of reference for cross-national comparisons of national characters. Behaviormetrika. 19:1992;23-41.
35. Yoshino R., Khor D. Complementary scaling for cross-national analyses of national character. Behaviormetrika. 22:1995;155-184.