Probation and the failure to optimally deter corporate misconduct

Southern California Law Review

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1075-

  Kennedy, Shayne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347803909     PISSN: 00383910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. For a sample of the debate surrounding the Guidelines, see generally Stanley S. Arkin, Corporate Sentencing Guidelines - Again, N.Y. L.J., June 13, 1991, at 3, available in LEXIS, Legnew Library, Nylawj File; John Levitske, Jr., Will the U.S. Sentencing Commission's New Proposed Guidelines for Crimes by Organizations Provide an Effective Deterrent for Crimes Attributed to Corporations? (Or Will the New Proposed Guidelines Put an Exclamation Point in the Sentence for Corporate Crime?), 29 DUQ. L. REV. 783 (1991); Jeffrey S. Parker, Rules Without . . . : Some Critical Reflections on the Federal Corporate Sentencing Guidelines, 71 WASH. U. L.Q. 397 (1993) (predicting that the new guidelines will have a devastating effect on the American economy); Victoria Toensing, Corporations on Probation: Sentenced to Fail, LEGAL TIMES, Feb. 12, 1990, at 21, available in LEXIS, Legnew Library, Lgltme File.
2. For a sample of the debate surrounding the Guidelines, see generally Stanley S. Arkin, Corporate Sentencing Guidelines - Again, N.Y. L.J., June 13, 1991, at 3, available in LEXIS, Legnew Library, Nylawj File; John Levitske, Jr., Will the U.S. Sentencing Commission's New Proposed Guidelines for Crimes by Organizations Provide an Effective Deterrent for Crimes Attributed to Corporations? (Or Will the New Proposed Guidelines Put an Exclamation Point in the Sentence for Corporate Crime?), 29 DUQ. L. REV. 783 (1991); Jeffrey S. Parker, Rules Without . . . : Some Critical Reflections on the Federal Corporate Sentencing Guidelines, 71 WASH. U. L.Q. 397 (1993) (predicting that the new guidelines will have a devastating effect on the American economy); Victoria Toensing, Corporations on Probation: Sentenced to Fail, LEGAL TIMES, Feb. 12, 1990, at 21, available in LEXIS, Legnew Library, Lgltme File.
3. For a sample of the debate surrounding the Guidelines, see generally Stanley S. Arkin, Corporate Sentencing Guidelines - Again, N.Y. L.J., June 13, 1991, at 3, available in LEXIS, Legnew Library, Nylawj File; John Levitske, Jr., Will the U.S. Sentencing Commission's New Proposed Guidelines for Crimes by Organizations Provide an Effective Deterrent for Crimes Attributed to Corporations? (Or Will the New Proposed Guidelines Put an Exclamation Point in the Sentence for Corporate Crime?), 29 DUQ. L. REV. 783 (1991); Jeffrey S. Parker, Rules Without . . . : Some Critical Reflections on the Federal Corporate Sentencing Guidelines, 71 WASH. U. L.Q. 397 (1993) (predicting that the new guidelines will have a devastating effect on the American economy); Victoria Toensing, Corporations on Probation: Sentenced to Fail, LEGAL TIMES, Feb. 12, 1990, at 21, available in LEXIS, Legnew Library, Lgltme File.
4. For a sample of the debate surrounding the Guidelines, see generally Stanley S. Arkin, Corporate Sentencing Guidelines - Again, N.Y. L.J., June 13, 1991, at 3, available in LEXIS, Legnew Library, Nylawj File; John Levitske, Jr., Will the U.S. Sentencing Commission's New Proposed Guidelines for Crimes by Organizations Provide an Effective Deterrent for Crimes Attributed to Corporations? (Or Will the New Proposed Guidelines Put an Exclamation Point in the Sentence for Corporate Crime?), 29 DUQ. L. REV. 783 (1991); Jeffrey S. Parker, Rules Without . . . : Some Critical Reflections on the Federal Corporate Sentencing Guidelines, 71 WASH. U. L.Q. 397 (1993) (predicting that the new guidelines will have a devastating effect on the American economy); Victoria Toensing, Corporations on Probation: Sentenced to Fail, LEGAL TIMES, Feb. 12, 1990, at 21, available in LEXIS, Legnew Library, Lgltme File.
5. See John C. Coffee, Jr., Richard Gruner & Christopher D. Stone, Standards for Organizational Probation: A Proposal to the United States Sentencing Commission, 10 WHITTIER L. REV. 77, 77 (1988).
6. See United States v. Mitsubishi Int'l Corp., 677 F.2d 785, 788-89 (9th Cir. 1982).