Changing Trends in Doctoral Training Programs in Psychology: A Comparative Analysis of Research-Oriented Versus Professional-Applied Programs

Psychological Science

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 475-481

  Maher, Brendan A ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347761791     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00192     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. American Psychological Association. (1995). Graduate study in psychology, 1994: With 1995 addendum. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Cartter, A. (1966). An assessment of quality in graduate education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
3. Goldberger, M.L., Maher, B. A., & Flattau, P.E. (1995). Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Jones, L.V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P.E. (1982). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States (5 vols.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Keniston, H. (1959). Graduate study and research in the arts and sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
6. National Research Council. (1993). Summary report 1992: Doctorate recipients from United States universities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Roose, K.D., & Anderson, C.J. (1970). A rating of graduate programs. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
8. Rowe, P.M. (1996, January). Panel, panel, on the Mall, who's the fairest of them all. APS Observer, 9, 1, 4-13.
9. Yu, L.M., Rinaldi, S.A., Templer, D.I., Colbert, L.A., Siscoe, K., & Van Patten, K. (1997). Score on the Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology as a function of attributes of clinical psychology graduate training programs. Psychological Science, 8, 347-350.