Methodology for Perceptual Assessment of Speech in Patients with Cleft Palate: A Critical Review of the Literature

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 64-70

  Lohmander, Anette ^a,c   Olsson, Maria ^b  

^a Dept/Speech Language Pathologist   (Sweden)

^b SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cleft palate; Literature review; Methodology; Perceptual speech assessment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CLEFT PALATE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA ANALYSIS; DENTISTRY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STANDARD; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CLEFT PALATE; DENTAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; SPEECH DISORDERS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 0347724013     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/02-136     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30(suppl).
2. Brønsted K, Liisberg W, Orsted A, Prytz S, Fogh-Andersen P. Surgical and speech results following palatopharyngoplasty operations, in Denmark 1959-1977. Cleft Palate J. 1984;21:170-179.
3. Dalston RM, Marsh JL, Vig KW, Witzel MA, Bumsted RM. Minimal standards for reporting the results of surgery on patients with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both: a proposal. Cleft Palate J. 1988;25:3-7.
4. Grunwell P, Brønsted K, Henningsson G, Jansonius K, Karling J, Meijer M, Ording U, Wyatt RM, Vermeij-Zieverink E, Sell D. A six-centre international study of the outcome of treatment in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: the results of a cross-linguistic investigation of cleft palate speech. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 2000;34:219-229.
5. Grunwell P, Sell DA. Speech and cleft palate/velopharyngeal anomalies. In: Watson ACH, Sell DA, Grunwell P, eds. Management of Cleft Lip and Palate. London: Whurr; 2001.
6. Grunwell P, Sell D, Harding A. Describing cleft palate speech. In: Grunwell P, ed. Analysing Cleft Palate Speech. London: Whurr; 1993.
7. Harding A, Grunwell P. Relationship between speech and timing of hard palate repair. In: Grunwell P, ed. Analysing Cleft Palate Speech. London: Whurr; 1993.
8. Harding A, Harland K, Razzel R. Cleft Audit Protcol for Speech (CAPS). Broomfield, Chelmsford, Essex, UK: Speech/Language Therapy Department, St. Andrews Plastic Surgery Centre; 1997.
9. Henningsson G, Hutters B. Perceptual assessment of cleft palate speech, with special reference to minimum standards for inter-centre comparisons of speech outcome. International Task Force Report. In: Transactions of the 8th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. Singapore: Stamford Press; 1997:xxxiii-xxxvii.
10. Hirschberg J, Van Demark DR. A proposal for standardization of speech and hearing evaluations to assess velopharyngeal function. Folia Phoniatrica Logop. 1997;49:158-167.
11. Jackson I, McLellan G, Scheker LR. Primary veloplasty or primary palatoplasty: some preliminary findings. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72:153-157.
12. Kent RD, Miolo G, Bloedel S. The intelligibility of children's speech: a review of evaluation procedures. Am J Speech Lang Path. 1994;3:81-95.
13. Kuehn DP, Moller KT. Speech and language issues in the cleft palate population: the state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:1-35.
14. Lohmander-Agerskov A. Speech outcome after cleft palate surgery with the Göteborg regimen including delayed hard palate closure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998;32:63-80.
15. Moll KL. 'Objective' measures of nasality. Cleft Palate J. 1964;1:371-374.
16. Moller KT, Starr CD. The effects of listening conditions on speech ratings obtained in a clinical setting. Cleft Palate J. 1984;21:65-69.
17. Morris HL. Velopharyngeal competence and primary cleft palate surgery, 1960-1971: a critical review. Cleft Palate J. 1973;10:62-71.
18. Morris HL, Spriestersbach DC, Darley FL. An articulation test for assessing competency of velopharyngeal closure. J Speech Hear Res. 1961;4:48-55.
19. Peterson-Falzone SJ, Hardin-Jones MA, Karnell MP. Assessment of speech-language problems. In: Peterson-Falzone SJ, Hardin-Jones MA, Karnell MP, eds. Cleft Palate Speech. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2001.
20. Roberts CT, Semb G, Shaw WC. Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:141-149.
21. Sell D, Grunwell PA. Speech assessment and therapy. In: Watson ACH, Sell DA, Grunwell P, eds. Management of Cleft Lip and Palate. London: Whurr: 2001.
22. Sell D, Grunwell P, Mildinhall S, Murphy T, Cornish TC, Williams A, Bearn D, Shaw WC, Murray J, Sandy J. Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom (UK)-the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 3-speech outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:30-37.
23. Sell D, Harding A, Grunwell PA. A screening assessment of cleft palate speech "GOS.SP.ASS" (Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment). Eur J Disord Commun. 1994;29:1-15.
24. Sell D, Harding A, Grunwell PA. GOS.SP.ASS'98: an assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). Int J Lang Commun Dis. 1999;34:17-33.
25. Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson P, Brattström V, Mölsted K, Prahl-Andersen B. The Eurocleft Project 1996-2000. Standards of Care for Cleft Lip and Palate in Europe. European Commission Biochemical and Health Research. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000.
26. Stephens MI, Daniloff R. A methodological study of factors affecting the judgement of misarticulated /s/. J Commun Dis. 1977;10:207-220.
27. Templin MC, Darley FL. The Templin-Darley Tests of Articulalion. 2nd ed. Iowa City: Bureau of Educational Research and Service, University of Iowa; 1969.
28. Trost-Cardamone JE. The development of speech: assessing cleft palate misarticulations. In: Kernahan DE, Rosenstein SW, eds. Cleft Lip and Palate: A System of Management. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1990.
29. Warren DW, Dalston RM, Mayo R. Hypernasality and velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994;4:257-270.
30. Whitehill T Assessing intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniafac J. 2002;39:50-58.
31. Whitehill T, Lee ASY, Chun JC. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002:45:80-88.
32. Zraick RI, Liss JM. A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:979-988.