Reactions of 2-, 3- and 4-quinolinols with cyclohexane and benzene in superacids

Heterocycles

Volumn 62, Issue , 2004, Pages 757-772

  Koltunov, Konstantin Yu ^a   Prakash, G K Surya ^a   Rasul, Golam ^a   Olah, George A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3 QUINOLINOL; 4 QUINOLINOL; ALUMINUM CHLORIDE; ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; BENZENE; CARBOSTYRIL; CYCLOHEXANE; QUINOLINOL DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; HYDROGENATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTON TRANSPORT; REACTION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0347720665     PISSN: 03855414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Chemistry in Superacids. Part 65. For part 64, See G. Rasul, G. K. S. Prakash, and G. A. Olah, J. Phys. Chem., A, in press.
2. (a) K. Yu. Koltunov, G. K. S. Prakash, G. Rasul, and G. A. Olah, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 4330.
3. (b) K. Yu. Koltunov, G. K. S. Prakash, G. Rasul, and G. A. Olah, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 8943.
4. (c) K. Yu. Koltunov, G. K. S. Prakash, G. Rasul, and G. A. Olah, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 5423.
5. (d) K. Yu. Koltunov and I. B. Repinskaya, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2000, 36, 446.
6. (e) K. Yu. Koltunov and I. B. Repinskaya, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 38, 437.
7. G. A. Olah, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 767.
8. For a low-temperature generation of substituted ethylene dications bearing electron-donating groups such as an aryl, a hydroxy, a methoxy and a N,N-dihydroxyamino groups or for their reactions with arenes, see (a) G. A. Olah and A. M. White, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 4752.
9. (b) G. A. Olah and M. Calin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1968, 90, 4672.
10. (c) G. A. Olah, J. L. Grant, and P. W. Westerman, J. Org. Chem., 1975, 40, 2102.
11. (d) T. Ohwada and K. Shudo, J. Am Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 1862.
12. (e) T. Ohwada and K. Shudo, J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 5227, and the references cited therein.
13. (f) T. Yamazaki, S. Saito, T. Ohwada, and K. Shudo, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 5749.
14. (h) D. A. Klumpp, K. Y. Yeung, G. K. S. Prakash, and G. A. Olah, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 4481.
15. (g) D. A. Klumpp, S. Lau, M. Garza, G. V. Sanchez, B. Schick, and K. Kantardjieff, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 7635.
16. I. B. Repinskaya, K. Yu. Koltunov, M. M. Shakirov, and V. A. Koptyug, J. Org. Chem., USSR. 1992, 28, 785.
17. Dications (19-27) were preferred based on the participation of the non-bonded electron pairs of both heteroatoms in charge delocalization (with the exception of 24). Favorable formation of dications (20, 21, 26 and 27) also conforms to positional selectivity of electrophilic substitution reactions of 11 and 13 in strong acids (hydrogen-deuterium exchange, nitration, etc.) to give 6- and 8-substituted 2- and 4-quinolones, see, for example: (a) R. M. Welch, A. R. Brown, and A. P. Phillips, Eur. Patent 1990, 356230.
18. (b) A. R. Katritzky, B. Terem, E. V. Scriven, S. Clementi, and H. O. Tarhan, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. II, 1975, 1600. The possibility of additional N-protonation of 11a-13a to give the Corresponding N,N-diprotonated dications was not considered to be kinetically favorable. See, for example, the discussion on that subject for 1- and 2-isoquinolinols: Ref. 2b.
19. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, R. E. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farcas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelly, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkarra, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Jonson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. M. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian 98 Revision A.5); Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
20. T. Ziegler, Chem. Rev., 1991, 91, 651.
21. Becke's three parameter hybrid method using the LYP correlation functional: (a) A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 5648.
22. (b) C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 785.
23. (c) P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chabalovski, and M. J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 11623.
24. W. J. Hehre, L. Radom, P. v. R. Schleyer, and J. A. Pople, Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory; Wiley-Interscience: New-York, 1986.
25. A. E. Reed, L. A. Curtiss, and F. Wienhold, Chem. Rev., 1988, 88, 899.
26. 5 by OR. See: K. Yu. Koltunov, I. B. Repinskaya, M. M. Shakirov, and L. N. Shchegoleva, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 1994, 30, 88.
27. 2 and q•, see, for example, Ref. 2a and 2b.
28. Under the reaction conditions cyclohexane exists in an equilibrium with methylcyclopentane, see: C. D. Nenitzescu and R. Cantuniari, Chem. Ber., 1933, 66, 1097.
29. 3. See Ref. 2b.
30. 3 at 25 °C gave in 10% conversion a complex reaction mixture.
31. K. M. Johnston, Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 5595, and the references cited therein.
32. J. Colonge and R. Chambard, Bull. Chem. Soc. Fr., 1953. 982.
33. The reaction mixture did not contain compound (11). A single byproduct (∼15%) of the reaction corresponds to the condensation of 35 with phenyl group of product (32).
34. K. Yu. Koltunov and I. B. Repinskaya, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 1994, 30, 97.
35. A. I. Meyers and G. Garcia-Munoz, J. Org. Chem., 1964, 29, 1435.
36. G. Salbeck, German Patent, Hoechst AG, DE 2426851, 1976.
37. As a mixture of 31/28 (95:5).
38. A. P. Venkov and S. M. Statkova-Abeghe, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 1451.
39. The data are taken from the spectra of mixture of the cis and trans isomers.