A comparison of aggregation approaches for second-order data

Industrial Marketing Management

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 277-292

  Smith, Brock ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347718571     PISSN: 00198501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0019-8501(98)00051-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Huston T.L., Robins E. Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Studying Close Relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family. November:1982;901-925.
2. Anderson W.T. Deciphering Dyads. Concepts, Methods, and Controversies in Relational Research Psychology & Marketing. 11:1994;447-466.
3. Anderson J.C., Hakansson H., Johanson J. Dyadic Business Relationships Within a Business Network Context. Journal of Marketing. 58:1994;1-15.
4. Borgatta E.F., Jackson D.J. Aggregate Data. Analysis and Interpretation:1980;Sage Publications, New York.
5. Hannon M.T. Aggregation and Disaggregation in Sociology. 1971;Lexington Books, Toronto.
6. John G., Reve T. The Reliability and Validity of Key Informant Data from Dyadic Relationships in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing Research. 19:1982;517-524.
7. Burstein L. The Analysis of Multilevel Data in Educational Research and Evaluation. Schulman L. Review of Research in Education. 1980;158-236 Peacock, Itasca, IL.
8. Kumar N., Stern L.W., Steenkamp J.B. Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants. Academy of Management Journal. 36:1993;1633-1651.
9. Anderson J.C., Narus J.A. A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships. Journal of Marketing. 54:1990;42-58.
10. Anderson E., Weitz B. Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads. Marketing Science. 8:1989;310-323.
11. Epstein S. Aggregation and Beyond. Some Basic Issues on the Prediction of Behavior Journal of Personality. 51:1983;360-392.
12. Hammond J.L. Two sources of error in ecological correlations. American Sociological Review. 38:1973;764-777.
13. Korukonda A.R. Mixing Levels of Analysis in Organizational Research. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. June:1989;1-8.
14. Rousseau D.M. Issues of Level in Organizational Research. Multi-Level and Cross-Level Perspectives Research in Organizational Behavior. 7:1985;1-37.
15. Magrath, A. J., and Hardy, K. G.: A Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Level of Mutual Trust between Manufacturers and Their Resellers. Working Paper Series, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, 1989.
16. Webster F.E., Wind Y. A General Model for Understanding Organizational Buying Behavior. Journal of Marketing. 36:1972;12-19.
17. Lang J.R., Dollinger M.J., Marino K.E. Aggregation Bias in Strategic Decision Making Research. Journal of Management. 13:1987;689-702.
18. Robinson W.S. Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review. 15:1950;351-356.
19. Kumar N., Stern L.W., Anderson J.C. The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research. 32:1995;348-357.
20. Thompson L., Walker A.J. The Dyad as the Unit of Analysis. Conceptual and Methodological Issues Journal of Marriage and the Family. November:1982;889-900.
21. Rowse G.L., Gustafson D.H., Ludke R.L. Comparison of Rules for Aggregating Subjective Likelihood Ratios. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 12:1974;274-284.
22. McNemar J. Psychological Statistics. 4th edition:1969;John Wiley, New York.
23. Gehkle C., Biehel R. Certain Effects of Grouping Upon the Size of the Correlation Coefficient in Census Tract Material. Journal of the American Statistical Association Supplement. 29:1934;169-170.
24. Hendry D. Monte Carlo Experimentation. Griliches Z., Intriligator M. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol 2. 1984;937-976 Elsevier Science Publishing, New York.
25. Smith J.B. Selling Alliances. Issues and Insights Industrial Marketing Management. 26:1997;149-161.
26. Smith J.B., Barclay D.W. The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships. Journal of Marketing. 61:1995;3-21.
27. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18:1981;39-50.