Bethesda 2001: How the new Pap terminology will impact clinical practice

Emergency Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 15-43

  Richart, Ralph M ^a   Cox, J Thomas ^b,c   Davey, Diane D ^d   Wright, Thomas C ^e  

^a New York Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Natl HPV Cervical Cancer Prev R   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^e Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347708786     PISSN: 00136654     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Elias A, Linthorst G, Bekker B, et al. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes. Acta Cytol. 1983;27:225-229.
2. Vooijs GP, Elias A, van der Graaf Y, et al. Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial cell abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1985; 323-328.
3. Alons-van Kordelaar JJM, Boon ME. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears. Acta Cytol. 1988;32:801-804.
4. Chakrabarti S, Guijon FB, Paraskevas M. Brush vs. spatula for cervical smears. Histologic correlation with concurrent biopsies. Acta Cytol. 1994;38:315-318.
5. Kristensen GB, Skyggebjerg KD, Holund B, et al. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Acta Cytol. 1991;35:47-50.
6. Mitchell H, Medley G. Longitudinal study of women with negative cervical smears according to endocervical status: Victorian Cytology Service, Melbourne, Australia. Lancet 1991;337: 265-267.
7. Kivlahan C, Ingram E. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate? Acta Cytol. 1986;30: 258-260.
8. Ransdell JS, Davey DD, Zaleski S. Clinicopathologic correlation of the unsatisfactory Papanicolaou smear. Cancer. 1997;81:139-143.
9. Stoler MH, Schiffman M. Intraobserver reproducibility of cervical cytology and histology interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS). JAMA. 2001;285:1506-1508.
10. Jones BA, Novis DA. Follow-up of abnormal gynecologic cytology. A College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 16,132 cases from 306 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:665-671.
11. Kinney WK, Manos MM, Hurley LB, et al. Where's the high-grade cervical neoplasia? The importance of minimally abnormal Papanicolaou diagnoses. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:973-976.
12. Ronnet BM, Manos MM, Ramesley JE, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): cytologic features, histopathologic results, and HPV DNA detection. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:816-825.
13. Kennedy AW, Salmiere SS, Wirth SL, et al. Results of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervical cytology screening. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63:14-18.
14. Valdini A, Vaccaro C, Pechinsky G, et al. Incidence and evaluation of an AGUS Papanicolaou smear in primary care. J Amer Board Fam Pract. 2001;14:172-177.
15. Duska LR, Flynn CF, Chen A, et al. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined signficance on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:278-282.
16. Taylor RR, Guerrini JP, Nash JD, et al. Atypical cervical cytology: colposcopic follow-up using the Bethesda System. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:443-447.
17. Goff BA, Atanosoff P, Brown E, et al. Endocervical glandular atypia in Pap smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:101-104.
18. Zweizig S, Noller K, Reale F, et al. Neoplasia associated with atypical glandular cellular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;65:314-318.
19. Nasu I, Meurer W, Fu YS. Endocervical glandular atypia and adenocarcinoma: a correlation of cytology and histology. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993;12:208-218.
20. Jones B, Novis D. Cervical biopsy-histology correlation. A College of American Pathologists Q Probes study of 22,439 correlations in 348 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;20:523-531.
21. Soofer SB, Sidawy MK. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Cancer. 2000;90:207-214.
22. Eddy GL, Wojtowycz MS, Piraino PS, et al. Papanicolaou smears by the Bethesda System in endometrial malignancy: utility and prognostic importance. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:999-1003.
23. Veljovich DS, Stoler MH, Andersen WA, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a five-year retrospective histopathologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:382-390.
24. Chhieng DC, Elgert P, Cohen JM, et al. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in post-menopausal women. Cancer. 2001;93:1-7.