Attitude change: The case of attitudes towards the "green card" in Germany

Current Research in Social Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 1-11

  Florack, Arnd ^a   Piontkowski, Ursula ^a   Knocks, Ina ^a   Rottmann, Julia ^a   Thiemann, Pia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347690943     PISSN: 10887423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Chaiken, Shelly (1980). "Heuristic vs. systematic information processing and the use of source vs. message cues in persuasion." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 524-537.
2. Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelly. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich.
3. Frey, Dieter (1986). "Recent research on selective exposure to information." In Leonard Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41-80). New York: Academic Press.
4. Frey, Dieter, and Wicklund, Robert A. (1978). "A clarification of selective exposure: The impact of choice." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17: 621-626.
5. Gaertner, Samuel L., and Dovidio, John F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In John F. Dovidio and Samuel L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). New York: Academic Press.
6. Gillig, Paulette M., and Greenwald, Antony G. (1974). "Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to the rest?" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29: 132-139.
7. Gruder, Charles L., Cook, Thomas D., Hennigan, Karen M., and Flay, Brian R. (1978). "Empirical test of the absolute Sleeper-Effect predicted from the discounting cue hypothesis." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36: 1061-1074.
8. Hovland, Carl I., Lumsdaine, Arthur A., and Sheffield, Fred D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Hovland, Carl I., and Weiss, Walter (1951). "The influence of source credibilitn communication effectiveness." Public Opinion Quarterly, 15: 635-650
10. Kruglanski, Arie W., and Thompson, Erik P. (1999). "Persuasion by a single route: a view from the unimodel." Psychological Inquiry, 10: 182-193.
11. Kruglanski, Arie W., Thompson, Erik P., and Spiegel, S. (1999). "Separate or equal? Bimodal notions of persuasion and a single-process "unimodel"." In Shelly Chaiken and Yaacov. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 293-313). New York: Guilford.
12. Miller, N., and Campbell, D. T. (1959). "Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of timing of speeches and measurements." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59: 1-9.
13. Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T. (1986). "The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion." In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
14. Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T., and Goldman, Rachel (1981). "Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
15. Pratkanis, Anthony R., Greenwald, Anthony G., Leippe, Michael R., and Baumgardner, Michael H. (1988). "In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The Sleeper-Effect is dead. Long live the Sleeper-Effect." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 203-218.