The New Public Management: A bibliographical essay for Latin American (and other) scholars

International Public Management Journal

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 229-265

  Barzelay, Michael ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347687050     PISSN: 10967494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7494(00)00038-6     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Arellano Gault, D., Gil, J. R., Macias, J. R., & Rojano, A. (2000). Nueva Gerencia Publica en Acción: Processos de Modernación Presupuestal. Reforma y Democracia, 17, 7-44.
2. Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes, and pendulums. Governance, 3, 115-37.
3. Aucoin, P. (1995). The new public management: Canada in comparative perspective. Montreal: IRPP.
4. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: the practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
5. Barzelay, M. (1991). Managing local development: lessons from Spain. Policy Sciences, 24, 271-290.
6. Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: a new vision for managing in government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Barzelay, M. (1998). Atrevasando la burocracia: una nueva perspectiva de la administración pública. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Economica.
8. Barzelay, M. (2000a). How to argue about the new public management. International Public Management Journal, 2, 183-216.
9. Barzelay, M. (2000b). A note on the resource-based view of strategy. Interdisciplinary Institute of Management, London School of Economics, June.
10. Barzelay, M. (2001). The new public management: improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Barzelay, M., & Fuechtner, N. (2000). Public management policy change: Germany in comparative perspective. Discussion Paper, Interdisciplinary Institute of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, September.
12. Barzelay, M., & Hassel, B. (1994). Revamping public management: improving comparative research. Paper presented at tenth anniversary conference of the structure and organization section of the International Political Science Association, Manchester University.
13. Barzelay, M., & O'Kean, J. M. (1989). Gestión pública estratégica: conceptos, analisis, y experiencias, El Caso IPIA, 2d ed. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
14. Bates, R., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J.-L., & Weingast, B. R. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
15. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Behn, R. (1991). Leadership Counts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
17. Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., & Walsh, P., eds. (1991). Reshaping the State: New Zealand's Bureaucratic Revolution. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
18. Brodtrick, O. (1991). A second look at the well-performing organization. In J. McDavid & B. Marson, The well-performing government organization (pp. 16-22). Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada.
19. Campbell, C., & Halligan, J. (1992). Political leadership in an age of constraint: the Australian experience. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
20. Castles, F., ed. (1993). Families of nations: patterns of public policy in western democracies. Aldershot, Hants.: Dartmouth.
21. Czarniawska, B. (1999). Writing management: organization theory as a literary genre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Dunn, W. (1994). Public policy analysis, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
23. Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Elster, J. (1998). A plea for social mechanisms. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg, Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory (pp. 45-73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Ferlie, E., Pettigrew, A., Ashburner, L., & Fitzgerald, L. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Gaskins, R. (1993). Burdens of proof and modern discourse. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Hall, P. (1992). The movement from Keynesianism to monetarism: institutional analysis and British economic policy in the 1970s. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth, Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 90-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, P. K. (1995). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
29. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
30. Hood, C. (1994). Explaining economic policy reversals. Buckingham: Open University Press.
31. Hood, C. (1996). United Kingdom: from second chance to near-miss learning. In J. P. Olsen & B. G. Peters, Lessons from experience: experimental learning in administrative reforms in eight democracies (pp. 36-70). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
32. Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state: culture, rhetoric, and public management. Oxford: Clarendon.
33. Hood, C., & Jackson, M. (1991). Administrative argument. Aldershot, Hants.: Dartmouth.
34. Kay, N. M. (1997). Pattern in corporate evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Kelman, S. (1986). Making public policy. New York: Basic Books.
36. Kelman, S. (1990). Procurement and public management. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press.
37. Kettl, D. F. (1995). Building lasting reform: enduring questions, missing answers. In D. F. Kettl & J. J. DiIulio, Inside the reinvention machine: appraising governmental reform (pp. 9-83). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
38. Kettl, D. F. (1997). The global revolution in public management: driving themes, missing links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 446-461.
39. Kettl, D. F. (2000). The global public management revolution. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
40. Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little Brown.
41. Kiser, E. (1996). The revival of narrative in historical sociology: what rational choice theory can contribute. Politics and Society, 24, 249-271.
42. Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing policy networks: labor politics in the US, Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
46. Lane, J.-E. (2000). New public management. London: Routledge.
47. Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The manager as negotiator. New York: Free Press.
48. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1990). Chester I. Barnard and the intelligence of learning. In O. Williamson, Organization theory: from Chester Barnard to the present and beyond (pp. 11-37). New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets: the world's political-economic systems. New York: Basic Books.
50. Lindblom, C. E. (1990). Inquiry and change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51. Lynn, L. (1996). Public management as art, science, and profession. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
52. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Free Press.
53. Mashaw, J. (1983). Bureaucratic justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Designing effective organizations: structures in fives. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
55. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
56. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari: a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. London: Prentice-Hall International.
57. Montgomery, J. (1998). Toward a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 92-125.
58. Montgomery, J. (Forthcoming). The self as a fuzzy set of roles, role theory as a fuzzy system. Sociological Methodology.
59. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine.
61. Olsen, J. P., & Peters, B. G., eds. (1996). Lessons from experience. Experimental learning in administrative reforms in eight democracies. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
62. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to statehouse, city hall to the Pentagon. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
63. Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Warner Books.
64. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Polsby, N. (1975). Legislatures. In F. Greenstein & N. Polsby, Handbook of Political Science (vol. 5, pp. 257-320). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
66. Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
67. Schauer, F. (1991). Playing by the rules. Oxford: Clarendon.
68. Schick, A. (1996). The spirit of reform: managing the New Zealand state sector in a time of change. Wellington: State Services Commission and the Treasury.
69. Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
70. Schwartz, H. (1994). Small states in big trouble. World Politics, 46, 527-555.
71. Simon, H. A. (1969). Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
73. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Tendler, J. (1995). Good government in the tropics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
75. Tendler, J., & Freedheim, S. (1994). Trust in a rent-seeking world: health and government transformed in northeast Brazil. World Development, 22, 1771-1791.
76. Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth, Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Thompson, D. (1987). Political ethics and public office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
79. Toulmin, S., & Jonsen, A. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: a history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
80. Walker, J. (1977). Setting the agenda in the U.S. Senate. British Journal of Political Science, 7, 423-445.
81. Walton, D. (1992). Plausible argument in everyday conversation. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
82. Weir, M. (1992). Ideas and the politics of bounded innovation. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth, Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 188-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: what governments agencies do, and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
84. Zifcak, S. (1994). New managerialism: administrative reform in Whitehall and Canberra. Buckingham, Eng.: Open University Press.