Clinical use and inter rater agreement in the application of the functional independence measure;Instrumento de evaluación funcional de la discapacidad en rehabilitación. Estudio de confiabilidad y experiencia clínica con el uso del Functional Independence Measure

Revista Medica de Chile

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 23-31

  Paolinelli G, Carlo ^a   González H, Pilar ^a   Doniez S, María Eugenia ^a   Donoso D, Tatiana ^a   Salinas R, Viviana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Disability evaluation; Physical medicine; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CRANIOCEREBRAL TRAUMA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0347664919     PISSN: 00349887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF IMPAIRMENTS, DISABILITIES AND HANDICAPS. A Manual of Classification relating to the consequences of disease. OMS 1980; 51-78.
2. MAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index, Maryland State Med J 1965; 14: 61-5.
3. MOSKOWITZ E, MCCANN CB. Classification of disability in the chronically ill and aging. J Chronic Dis 1957; 5: 342-6.
4. KATZ S, FORD AB, MOSKOWITZ RW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL; A standardised measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185: 914-9.
5. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM), Version 4.0. Buffalo, NY 14214: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1993.
6. WERNER RA. Predicting outcome after acute stroke with the Functional Independence Measure. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1994; 1: 30-9.
7. MARINO RJ, HUANG M, KNIGHT P, HERBISON GJ, DITUNNO JF JR., SEGAL M. Assessing selfcare status in quadriplegia: comparison of the Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Paraplegia 1993; 31: 225-33.
8. OCZKOWSKI WJ, BARRECA S. The Functional Independence Measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 1291-4.
9. CALMELS P, PEREIRA A, DOMENACH M, PALLOT PRADES B, ALEXANDRE C, MINAIRE P. Functional ability and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation using the Functional Independence Measure and the reintegration to normal living index. Revue du Rhumatisme English Edition 1994; 61: 723-31.
10. COOK L, SMITH DS, TRUMAN G. Using Functional Independence Measure profiles as an index of outcome in the rehabilitation of brain-injured patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 390-3.
11. COWEN TD, MEYTHALER JM, DE VIVO MJ, IVIE CS 3RD, LEBOW J, NOVACK TA. Influence of early variables in traumatic brain injury on Functional Independence Measure scores and rehabilitation length of stay and charges. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1995; 76: 797-803.
12. MARCINIAK CM, SLIWA JA, SPILL G, HEINEMANN AW, SEMIK PE. Functional outcome following rehabilitation of the cancer patient. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 54-7.
13. MORTIFEE PR, BUSSER J, ANTON HA. The performance of a limited set of items from the Functional Independence Measure for use in acute trauma care and rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 436-9.
14. SANDSTROM R, MOKLER PJ, HOPPE KM. Discharge destination and motor function outcome in severe stroke as measured by the functional independence measure/function-related group classification system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 762-5.
15. MCKINLEY WO, TELLIS AA, CIFU DX, JOHNSON MA, KUBAL WS, KEYSER-MARCUS L, MUSGROVE JJ. Rehabilitation outcome of individuals with nontraumatic myelopathy resulting from spinal stenosis. J Spinal Cord Med 1998; 21: 131-6.
16. O'DELL MW, BARR K, WARNICK RE. Functional outcome of inpatient rehabilitation in persons with brain tumors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1530-4.
17. HALL KM, COHEN ME, WRIGHT J, CALL M, WERNER P. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1471-6.
18. AITKEN ME, JAFFE KM, DISCALA C, RIVARA FP. Functional outcome in children with multiple trauma without significant head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 889-95.
19. TSUJI T, LIU M, TOIKAWA H, HANAYAMA K, SONODA S, CHINO N. ADL structure for nondisabled Japanese children based on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 78: 208-12.
20. GRANGER CV, DEUTSCH A, LINN RT. Rasch analysis of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Mastery Test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 52-7.
21. RAVAUD JF, DELCEY M, YELNIK A. Construct validity of the functional independence measure (FIM): questioning the unidimensionality of the scale and the "value" of FIM scores. Scand J Rehabil Med 1999; 31: 31-41.
22. OTTENBACHER KJ, MANN WC, GRANGER CV, TOMITA M, HURREN D, CHARVAT B. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 1297-301.
23. SEGAL ME, DITUNNO JF, STAAS WE. Interinstitutional agreement of individual Functional Independence Measure (FIM) items measured at two sites on one sample of SCI patients. Paraplegia 1993; 31: 622-31.
24. HEINEMANN AW, LINACRE JM, WRIGTH BD, HAMILTON BB, GRANGER CV. Final Report: Rating Scale Analysis of Functional Independence Measure. Proyect Number: H133H90167: Departament of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Chicago: Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 1991.
25. HEINEMANN AW, LINACRE JM, WRIGTH BD, HAMILTON BB, GRANGER CV. Measurement characteristic of the Function Independence Measure. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1994; 1: 1-15.
26. KIDD D, STEWART G, BALDRY J, JOHNSON J, ROSSITER D, PETRUCKEVITCH A, THOMPSON AJ. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 1995; 17: 10-4.
27. HAMILTON BB, LAUGHLIN JA, FIEDLER RC, GRANGER CV. Interrater agreement of the 7-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1994; 26: 115-9.
28. FRICKE J, UNSWORTH C, WORRELL D. Reliability of the Functional Independence Measure with occupational therapist. Aust Occup Ther J 1993; 40: 7-15.
29. LINACRE JM, HEINEMANN AW, WRIGTH BD, HAMILTON BB, GRANGER CV. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 127-32.
30. BROSSEAU L, WOLFSON C. The inter-rater reliability and construct validity of the Functional Independence Measure for multiple sclerosis subjects. Clinical Rehabilitation. 1994; 8: 107-15.
31. DODDS TA, MARTIN DP, STOLOV WC, DEYO RA. Validation of the Functional Independence Measure and its perfomance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 531-6.
32. OTTENBACHER KJ, Hsu Y, GRANGER CV, FIEDLER RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 1226-32.
33. CHAU N, DALER S, ANDRE JM, PATRIS A. Inter-rater agreement of two functional independence scales: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale. Disability Rehabil 1994; 16: 63-71.
34. FIEDLER RC, GRANGER CV. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1995. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76; 76-81.
35. FIEDLER RC, GRANGER CV. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1996. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 77; 69-75.
36. FLEISS J. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley. New York, 1981, 218.