Output-based allocation as a form of protection for internationally competitive industries

Climate Policy

Volumn 3, Issue SUPP 2, 2003, Pages

  Haites, Erik ^a  

^a Margaree Consultants Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

Leakage; Output based allocation; Performance based allocation; Relative targets

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; GREENHOUSE GAS; INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION;

ALBERTA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 0347662354     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Alberta, October 2002. Albertans and Climate Change: Taking Action. Government of Alberta, Edmonton.
2. Bernard, A., Fischer, C., Vielle, M., 2001. Is there a rationale for rebating environmental levies? Discussion Paper 1-31, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
3. Bode, S., 2003. Abatement costs vs. compliance costs in multi-period emissions trading-the firms' perspective. Discussion Paper 230, Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Hamburg.
4. Burtraw, D., Palmer, K., Bharvirkar, R., Paul, A., 2001. The effect of allowance allocation on the cost of carbon emission trading. Discussion Paper 1-30, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
5. Cheminfo Services Inc., HALOA Inc., Margaree Consultants Inc., Clearstone Engineering Inc., 2003. Alberta environment emission trading project: major feasibility study, preliminary analysis and discussion document. Alberta Environment, Edmonton.
6. COAG (Council of Australian Governments), 2002. Towards a Truly National and Efficient Energy Market. Canberra.
7. Edwards T.H.Hutton J.P.Allocation of carbon permits within a country: a general equilibrium analysis of the United Kingdom Energy Econ. 23 2001 371-386
8. Ellerman, A.D., Sue Wing, I., 2003. Absolute vs. intensity-based emission caps. Report No. 100, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
9. Fischer, C., 2001. Rebating environmental policy revenues: output-based allocations and tradable performance standards. Discussion Paper 1-22, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
10. Gielen, A.M., Koutstaal, P.R., Vollebergh, H.R.J., 2002. Comparing emission trading with absolute and relative targets. Paper Presented at the 2nd CATEP Workshop, London, 25-26 March
11. Paltsev S.V.The Kyoto Protocol: regional and sectoral contributions to the carbon leakage Energy J. 224 2001 53-79
12. Quirion, P., 2002. Can Europe afford non-global CO2 emission trading? The iron and steel industry case. Paper Presented at the 3rd CATEP Workshop, Kiel, 30 September-1 October
13. Salmons, R., 1999. Performance-based credit trading. Working Paper GEC 99-10, The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), available at http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge