Customizable workflow monitoring

Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 313-325

  Hur, Wonchang ^a   Bae, Hyerim ^a   Kang, Suk Ho ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Business process; Customization; WFMS; Workflow monitoring

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MANAGERS; PERFORMANCE;

CUSTOMIZABLE WORKFLOW MONITORING; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0347657138     PISSN: 1063293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1063293X03039903     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abate, A. et al. (2002). Workflow Performance Evaluation through WPQL, In: Proc. the 14th Int'l Conf. Software Eng. and Knowledge Eng., pp. 489-495, Ischia, Italy.
2. Ader, M. (2002). Workflow Comparative Study, WandGS, http://www.wngs.com
3. Arpinar, I.B. et al. (1999). Formalization of Workflows and Correctness Issues in the Presence of Concurrency, Distributed and Parallel Databases, 7(2): 199-248.
4. Bae, H. and Kim, Y. (2001). A Document-Process Association Model for Workflow Management, Computers In Industry, 47(2): 139-154.
5. Bae, J.S. (2000). Automatic Enactment of Workflow Process using Active Databases, Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul Nat'l Univ., Seoul, Korea.
6. Casati, F. et al. (1996). Deriving Active Rules for Workflow Enactment, In: Proc. 7th Int'l Conf. Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA '96), pp. 94-110, Zurich, Switzerland.
7. Casati, F. et al. (2000) Using Patterns to Design Rules in Workflows, IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 26(8): 760-785.
8. Chen, Q. et al. (2000). Multi-agent Cooperation, Dynamic Workflow and XML for E-commerce Automation, In: Proc. the 4th Int'l Conf. Autonomous Agents, pp. 255-256, Barcelona, Spain.
9. Chun, S.A., Atluri, V. and Adam, N. (2002) Dynamic Composition of Workflows for Customized eGovernment Service Delivery, In: Proc. 2nd Nat'l Conf. Digital Govt. (dg.o 2002), Los Angeles, CA.
10. Cugola, G., Nitto, E.D. and Fuggetta, A. (2001). The JEDI Event-Based Infrastructure and Its Application to the Development of the OPSS WFMS, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(9): 827-850.
11. Dayal, U., Hsu, M. and Ladin, R. (1990). Organizing Long-running Activities with Triggers and Transactions, In: Proc. the ACM SIGMOD, pp. 204-214.
12. Fink, J. and Kobsa, A. (2000). A Review and Analysis of Commercial User Modeling Servers for Personalization on the World Wide Web, User Modeling and User-Adaptive Interaction, 10(2-3): 209-249.
13. Hasegawa, A., Itoh, K. and Kumagai, S. (2000). Collaboration Task Analysis by Identifying Multi-Context and Collaborative Linkage, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 8(1): 61-71.
14. Holowczak, R. et al. (2001). Customized Geospatial Workflows for E-Government Services, In: Proc. the 9th ACM Int'l Symp. Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS' 2001), pp. 64-69, Atlanta, Georgia.
15. Hong, H.-S. et al. (2000). A Web-Based Transactional Workflow Monitoring System, In: Proc. the First Int'l Conf. Web Information Systems Eng., pp. 166-173, Hong Kong, China.
16. Kim, Y. et al. (2000). WW-Flow: Web-Based Workflow Management with Runtime Encapsulation, IEEE Internet Computing, 4(3): 55-64.
17. Kuo, Y.-F. and Chen, L.-S. (2001). Personalization Technology Application to Internet Content Provider, Expert Systems with Applications, 21(4): 203-215.
18. Muehlen, M. and Rosemann, M. (2000). Workflow-based Process Monitoring and Controlling - Technical and Organizational Issues, In: Proc. The 33rd Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences (HICSS' 2000), pp. 1972-1981, Maui, Hawaii.
19. Pozewaunig, H., Eder, J. and Liebhart, W. (1997). ePERT: Extending PERT for Workflow Management System, In: Proc. the First East-European Symp. Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS' 97), pp. 217-224, Nevsky Dialect, St. Petersburg.
20. Prasad, B. (2000). Survey of Life-cycle Measures and Metrics for Concurrent Product and Process Design, AI EDAM, 14(2): 163-176.
21. Schäl, T. (1996). Workflow Management Systems for Process Organization (Lecture Note in Computer Science 1096), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
22. The Apache Cocoon Project. 2003. Introducing Cocoon, http://cocoon.apache.org/
23. Van der Aalst, W. M. P. and Ter Hofstede, A.H.M. (2000). Verification of Workflow Task Structures: A Petri-Net-Based Approach, Information Systems, 25(1): 43-69.
24. Wang, M. and Huaiqing, W. (2002). Intelligent Agent Supported Flexible Workflow Monitoring System, In: Proc. the 14th Int'l Conf. Advanced Information Systems Eng. (CAiSE 2002), pp. 787-791, Toronto, Canada.
25. WfMC-TC-1003a (1995). The Workflow Reference Model, Workflow Management Coalition, Lighthouse Point, Fla.
26. WfMC-TC-1015 (1998). Interface5: Audit Data Specification, Workflow Management Coalition, Lighthouse Point, Fla.
27. Xu, D. and Wang, H. (2002). Multi-agent collaboration for B2B Workflow Monitoring, Knowledge-Based System, 15(8): 485-491.
28. Yphise Software Assessment Report (2002). Business Process Management Systems - Executive Volume, Yphise.
29. Zeng, L. et al. (2001). An Agent-based Approach for Supporting Cross-enterprise Workflows, In: Proc. the 12th Australasian Conf. Database Technologies, pp. 123-130, Queensland, Australia.