Where is Mathematical Modeling in Psychology Headed?

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 723-737

  Luce, R Duncan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computation; Future directions; Imaging; Mathematical psychology; Non linear dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347655187     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354399096001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Davison, M., & McCarthy, D. (Eds.). (1988). The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Edwards, W.(Ed.). (1990). Utility theories: Measurements and applications. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic.
3. Estes, W.K.(1994). Classification and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D.G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650-669.
5. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., & the ABC Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 129-166.
7. Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement: Vol. I. Additive and polynomial representations. New York: Academic Press.
8. LaBerge, D.(1995). Attentional processing: The brain's art of mindfulness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Loewenstein, G., & Elster, J. (Eds.). (1992). Choice over time. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10. Luce, R.D.(1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Luce, R.D.(in press). On Prelec's axiomatization of weighting functions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
12. Luce, R.D., Krantz, D.H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of measurement: Vol. III. Representation, axiomatization, and invariance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Marley, A.A.J.(Ed.). (1997). Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Newell, A.(1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Prelec, D.(1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66(3), 497-527.
16. Saari, D.G.(1994 a). Dynamical chaos to explain voting and statistical paradoxes. In J.R. Dirge & K.G. Murty (Eds.), Mathematical programming: State of the art 1994 (pp. 259-275). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17. Saari, D.G.(1994 b). Geometry of voting. Berlin: Springer.
18. Saari, D.G.(1995). Basic geometry of voting. Berlin: Springer.
19. Saari, D.G.(1996). The ease of generating chaos in economics. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 7(12), 2267-2278.
20. Suppes, P., Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement: Vol. II. Geometrical, threshold, and probabilistic representations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Townsend, J.T., & Ashby, F.G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Wakker, P.P.(1989). Additive representations of preferences: A new foundation for decision analysis. Dordrecht/Boston, MA/London: Kluwer Academic.
23. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.