Personality, intelligence, and art

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 705-715

  Furnham, Adrian ^a   Chamorro Premuzic, Tomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Art judgement; Big Five; Intelligence; Personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347653036     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00128-4     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bryan A. Grades, intelligence and personality of art school freshmen Journal of Educational Psychology 33 1942 50-64
2. Burkhart R. The relation of intelligence to art ability Journal of Aesthetic and Art Criticism 14 1958 230-241
3. Burt, C. (1933). The psychology of art. In How the mind works (chap. 15). London: Allen and Unwin.
4. Cardinet J. Preferences Esthetiques et Personalite Annee Psychologique 58 1958 45-69
5. Carroll H. Enrich A. Abstract intelligence and art appreciation Journal of Educational Psychology 23 1932 214-220
6. Child I. Personal preferences as an expression of aesthetic sensitivity Journal of Personality 30 1962 496-512
7. Child I. Personality correlates of esthetic judgment in college students Journal of Personality 33 1965 476-511
8. Costa P. McCrae R. NEO-PI-R: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) 1992 Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, FL
9. Eysenck H.J. The general factor in aesthetic judgements British Journal of Psychology 31 1940 94-102
10. Eysenck H.J. 'Type'-factors in aesthetic judgements British Journal of Psychology 31 1941 262-270
11. Eysenck H.J. Factor analytic study of the Maitland Graves Design Judgement Test Perceptual and Motor Skills 24 1967 13-14
12. Eysenck H.J. An application of the Maitland Graves Design Judgement Test to professional artists Perceptual and Motor Skills 30 1970 584-590
13. Eysenck H.J. Preference judgements for polygons, designs, and drawings Perceptual and Motor Skills 34 1972 396-398
14. Eysenck H.J. Personality and scientific aesthetics. In Farley F. Neperud R. (Eds.), Foundations of aesthetics art and art education 1988 Praeger New York
15. Eysenck H.J. The psychology of personality and aesthetics. In Van Toller S. Dodd G. (Eds.), Fragrance: the psychology and biology of perfume 1992 Ebemer New York
16. Eysenck H.J. Castle M. Comparative study of artists and non artists on the Maitland Graves Design Judgement Tests Journal of Applied Psychology 55 1971 389-391
17. Furnham A. Avison M. Personality and preference for surreal paintings Personality and Individual Differences 23 1997 923-935
18. Furnham A. Bunyan M. Personality and art preferences European Journal of Personality 2 1988 67-74
19. Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Moutafi, J. Personality and intelligence: the Big Five, gender, self-estimated and psychometric intelligence. (in review)
20. Furnham A. Walker J. Personality and judgement of Abstract, Pop Art, and Representational Paintings European Journal of Personality 15 2001 57-72
21. Furnham A. Walker J. The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference Personality and Individual Differences 31 2001 997-1017
22. Gerard H. Blevans G. Malcom T. Self-evaluation and the evaluation of choice alternatives Journal of Personality 32 1964 395-410
23. Glasgow M. Cartier A. Wilson E. Conservatism, sensation-seeking and music preferences Personality and Individual Differences 6 1985 395-396
24. Gotz K. Gotz K. The Maitland Graves Design Judgement Test judged by 22 Perceptual and Motor Skills 39 1974 261-262
25. Granger E. An experimental study of colour preferences Journal of General Psychology 52 1956 3-20
26. Graves M. Design Judgement Test 1948 Psychological Corporation San Antonio
27. Green, M., & Pickford, R. (1968). A factor analysis of ratings of schizophrenic paintings. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Aesthetics. Amsterdam, 1964. Amsterdam: Mouton.
28. Hardiman G. Liu F. Zernich T. Assessing knowledge in the visual arts. In Cupuchik G. Laszlo J. (Eds.), Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: psychology, semiology and philosophy 1992 Cambridge University Press New York
29. Juhasz J. Paxson L. Personality and preference for painting style Perceptual and Motor Skills 46 1978 347-349
30. Knapp R. Wulff A. Preferences for abstract and representational art Journal of Social Psychology 60 1963 255-262
31. Lepore E. Further research on the Graves Judgement Art Test Bolletino di Psychologia Applicata 51 1962 15-18
32. Little P. Zuckerman M. Sensation seeking and music preferences Personality and Individual Differences 4 1986 575-578
33. Liu F. Critique of three tests of aesthetic judgement Visual Arts Research 16 1990 90-94
34. McAdony, M. (1929). The construction and validation of an art test. Teachers College Contribution to Education, N. 383.
35. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of Openness to Experience. In R. Hogan & J. Johnson (Eds). Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). Tulsa, US.
36. Meehl E. Rosen A. Antecedent probability and the efficincy of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores Psychological Bulletin 5 1955 194-216
37. Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Patiel. A. Can demographic and personality factors predict psychometric intelligence? (Submitted for publication).
38. Munsterberg E. Mussen P. The personality structure of art students Journal of Personality 21 1953 457-466
39. Pichot P. Volmat R. Wiart C. Exploration of aesthetic aptitudes in the mental patient Revue de Psychologie Appliquee 10 1960 165-181
40. Prothrpo E. Perry H. Group differences in performance on the Meier Art Test Journal of Applied Psychology 34 1950 96-97
41. Rawlings D. Barrantes-Vidal N. Furnham A. Personality and aesthetic preference in Spain and England: two studies relating sensation seeking and openness to experience to liking for paintings and music European Journal of Personality 14 2000 553-576
42. Rawlings D. Twomey F. Burns E. Morris S. Personality and aesthetic preference in Spain and England European Journal of Personality 14 1998 553-576
43. Robertoux P. Carlier M. Chaguiboff J. Preference for non-objective art: Personal and psychological determiners British Journal of Psychology 62 1 1971 105-110
44. Rosenbluh E. Owens G. Pohler M. Art preference and personality British Journal of Psychology 63 1972 441-443
45. Shelton J. Harris T. Personality characteristics of art students Psychological Reports 44 1979 949-950
46. Siceloff M. Woodyard E. Validity and standarization of the McAdony Art Test 1933 Teachers College Contribution NY
47. Spiaggia M. An investigation of the personality traits of art students Educational and Psychological Measurement 10 1950 285-293
48. Stallings B. Anderson F. Some characteristics and correlates of the Meier Art Test of Aesthetic Perception under two systems of scoring Journal of Educational Measurement 6 1969 170-185
49. Tobacyck J. Myers H. Bailey L. Preference for paintings and personality traits Psychological Reports 46 1979 787-793
50. Tobacyck J. Myers H. Bailey L. Field-dependence, sensation seeking and preference for paintings Journal of Personality Assessment 45 1981 270-277
51. Uduehi J. A cross-cultural assessment of the Maitland Graves Design Judgement Test using IS and Nigerian subjects Visual Arts Research 21 1996 11-18
52. Wilson G.D. Ausman J. Matthews T.R. Conservatism and art preferences Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25 1973 286-288
53. Wilson G.D. Patterson J. Conservatism and art preferences Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25 1969 286-289
54. Wonderlic, E. (1992). Wonderlic personnel test. IL: Libertyville
55. Zaleski Z. Sensation seeking and preference for emotional visuali stimuli Personality and Individual Differences 5 1984 609-611
56. Zuckerman M. Sensation Seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal 1979 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
57. Zuckerman M. Behavioural expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking 1994 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
58. Zuckerman M. Ulrich R. McLaughlin J. Sensation seeking and reactions to nature paintings Personality and Individual Differences 15 1993 563-576