Effect of stem flattening on rotational stability of a canine femoral total hip component in polymethylmethacrylate cement

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 238-242

  Mason, D R ^a   Schulz, K S ^b   Kass, P H ^b   Stover, S M ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Canine; Femoral stem; Torsion; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; LOADING TEST; RIGIDITY; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0347627456     PISSN: 09320814     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632786     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bergmann G, Siraky Rohlman A. A comparison of hip joint forces in sheep, dog and man. J Biomechanics 1984; 17: 907-21.
2. Crowninshield R, Brand RA, Johnston RC. An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62: 67-8.
3. Crowninshield RD, Johnston RC, Andrews JG, et al. A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. J Biomechanics 1978; 11: 75.
4. Davis JP, Burke DW, O'Connor DO. Comparison of the fatigue characterisitics of centrifuged and uncentrifuged simplex P bone cement. J Orthop Res 1987; 5: 366-71.
5. Edwards MR, Egger EL, Schwarz PD. Aseptic loosening of the femoral implant after cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 11 cases in 10 dogs (1991-1995). JAVMA 1997; 21: 580-6.
6. Harrigan TP, Harris WH. A three dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components. J Biomechanics 1991; 24: 1047-58.
7. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR. Hisomorphological studies of the long term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990; 72: 1220-9.
8. Maloney WJ, Schmalzried TP, Jasty M. The cement interface. Retrieval studies. In: Morrey BF (ed). Biological, material, and mechanical considerations of joint replacement. New York: Raven Press Ltd 1993, 51-68.
9. Mann KA, Kim BS. Influence of stem shape on fatigue fracture of the cement mantle in femoral hip components. Abstract ORS Annual Meeting. Orthopedic Research Society 2000; 3: 12-5.
10. Mjoberg B, Hansson LI, Selvik G. Instability of total hip prostheses at rotational stress. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55: 504-6.
11. Montgomery RD, Milton JL, Pernell R. Total hip arthroplasty for treatment of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Clin North Am Small Pract 1992; 22: 703-19.
12. Olmstead ML. The canine cemented modular total hip prosthesis. JAAHA 1995; 31: 109-24.
13. Page AE, Allan C, Jasty M. Determination of loading parameters in the canine hip in-vivo. J Biomechanics 1993; 26: 571-9.
14. Pluhar E. Retrieval data from 38 canine total hip replacements. Personal communication 2001.
15. Saha S, Pal S. Mechanical properties of bone cement. J Bio Mat Res 1984; 18: 435-62.
16. Sugiyama H, Whiteside L., Kaiser AD. Examination of rotational fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. A mechanical study of micromovement and acoustic emission. Clin Orthop 1989; 249: 122-8.
17. Weightman B, Freeman MAR, Revell PA. The mechanical properties of cement and loosening of the femoral component of hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1987; 64: 558-64.
18. Wroblewski BM. The mechanism of fracture of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement. Int Orthop 1979; 3: 137-9.