Disclosure in Regulatory Science

Science

Volumn 302, Issue 5653, 2003, Pages 2073-

  Michaels, David ^a   Wagner, Wendy ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REGULATORY APPROACH; SCIENCE IN GENERAL;

FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL APPROACH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; STANDARD;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; LEGAL APPROACH;

CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DISCLOSURE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; PRIVATE SECTOR; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES;

EID: 0347623379     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1093718     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals, www.ICMJE.org (October 2001).
2. F. Davidoff et al., JAMA 286, 1232 (2001).
3. S. Krimsky, Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted the Virtue of Biomedical Research? (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2003).
4. U.S. General Accounting Office, "Biomedical research: HHS direction needed to address financial conflicts of interest" (GAO-02-89, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2001).
5. M. K. Cho et al., JAMA 284, 2203 (2000).
6. American Assoc. of University Professors, Statement on Corporate Funding of Academic Research 2001, available at www.aaup.org/statements/
7. J. E. Bekelman et al., JAMA 289, 454 (2003).
8. J. Lexchin et al., BMJ 326, 1167 (2003).
9. D. Rennie, JAMA 282, 1766 (1999).
10. S. A. Glantz et al., The Cigarette Papers (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 1996).
11. G. Markowitz, D. Rosner, Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 2002).
12. D. Rennie, JAMA 277, 1238 (1997).
13. P. Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial (Pantheon Books, New York, 1985).
14. Code Fed. Regul. (C.F.R.) 40,/2.201-2.310.
15. U.S. General Accounting Office, Toxic Substances Control Act: Legislative Changes Could Make the Act More Effective (GAO/RCED-94-103, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1994).
16. Pub. L. No. 105-277, Stat. 112, 2681 (1998).
17. C.F.R. 42,/50, A, Scientific Misconduct.
18. Fed. Regist. 67, 8452 (2002).
19. C.F.R. 21,/54.