59Co nuclear magnetic resonance studies of magnetic excitations in ferromagnetic nanowires

Applied Physics Letters

Volumn 76, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 903-905

  Scarani, Valerio ^a   De Riedmatten, Hugues ^a   Ansermet, Jean Philippe ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347616978     PISSN: 00036951     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.125624     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. P. Panissod, in Frontiers in Magnetism of Reduced Dimensions, edited by P. Wiger and V. G. Baryakhtar, NATO ASI Series (Kluwer Academic, Dodrecht, 1998).
2. H. A. M. de Gronckel and W. J. M. de Jonge, in Magnetic Multilayers, edited by Bennett, Watson (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
3. E. A. Turov and M. P. Petrov, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in ferro- and Antiferromagnets (Halsted, New York, 1972).
4. I. D. Weisman, L. J. Swartzendruber, and L. H. Bennett, in Measurement of Physical Properties, Part 2: Magnetic Properties and Mossbauer Effect, edited by E. Passaglia (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1973).
5. J. Dho and S. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7835 (1997).
6. T. Moriya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 19, 681 (1964); Moriya's estimates were later corrected: R. E. Walstedt, V. Jaccarino, and N. Kaplan, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 21, 1843 (1966); M. B. Salamon, ibid. 21, 2746 (1966). These results are summarised in Table 1 of: B. G. Turrell, Hyperfine Interact. 7, 429 (1980).
7. T. Moriya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 19, 681 (1964); Moriya's estimates were later corrected: R. E. Walstedt, V. Jaccarino, and N. Kaplan, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 21, 1843 (1966); M. B. Salamon, ibid. 21, 2746 (1966). These results are summarised in Table 1 of: B. G. Turrell, Hyperfine Interact. 7, 429 (1980).
8. T. Moriya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 19, 681 (1964); Moriya's estimates were later corrected: R. E. Walstedt, V. Jaccarino, and N. Kaplan, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 21, 1843 (1966); M. B. Salamon, ibid. 21, 2746 (1966). These results are summarised in Table 1 of: B. G. Turrell, Hyperfine Interact. 7, 429 (1980).
9. T. Moriya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 19, 681 (1964); Moriya's estimates were later corrected: R. E. Walstedt, V. Jaccarino, and N. Kaplan, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 21, 1843 (1966); M. B. Salamon, ibid. 21, 2746 (1966). These results are summarised in Table 1 of: B. G. Turrell, Hyperfine Interact. 7, 429 (1980).
10. C. Bohek, R. Dullenbacher, and E. Klein. Hyperfine Interact. 77, 327 (1993).
11. M. Weger, Phys. Rev. 128, 1505 (1962).
12. N. Kaplan, V. Jaccarino, and R. T. Lewis, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 500 (1968).
13. We know of another instance where a link was reported between relaxation in zero field and a layered structure: N. A. Lesnik and V. O. Golub, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7, 511 (1993). However, we did not observe any systematic dependance of SLR on the layer thickness. A dependence of SLR on nuclear spin waves was demonstrated: G. Seewald, E. Hagh, and H. Zech, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5002 (1997).
14. We know of another instance where a link was reported between relaxation in zero field and a layered structure: N. A. Lesnik and V. O. Golub, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7, 511 (1993). However, we did not observe any systematic dependance of SLR on the layer thickness. A dependence of SLR on nuclear spin waves was demonstrated: G. Seewald, E. Hagh, and H. Zech, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5002 (1997).
15. A. Blondel, J. P. Meier, B. Doudin, and J.-Ph. Ansermet. Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 3019 (1994).
16. V. Scarani, B. Doudin, and J.-Ph. Ansermet, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 205, 241 (1999).
17. R. Ferré, K. Ounadjela, J. M. George, L. Piraux, and S. Dubois, Phys. Rev. B 56, 14066 (1997).
18. J.-E. Wegrowe, D. Kelly, A. Franck, S. E. Gilbert, and J.-Ph. Ansermet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3681 (1999).
19. K. Le Dang, P. Veillet, C. Chappert, R. F. C. Farrow, R. F. Marks, and D. Weller, Phys. Rev. B 48, 14023 (1993).
20. T. Thomson, H. Kubo, J. S. Lord, P. C. Riedi, and M. J. Walker, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 6504 (1994).
21. Even in the fee structure, a quadrupolar splitting is present: K. Hagn and E. Zech, Phys. Rev. B 25, 1529 (1982). Therefore the arguments developed in pp. 257-260 of Ref. 20 apply. The mean value for α delined in Eq. (55) of Abragam's book is (1+1/2), obtained with m = 1/2.
22. A. Abragam, Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Clarendon, Oxford, 1996).
23. A. C. Gossard, A. M. Portis, M. Rubinstein, and R. H. Lindquist, Phys. Rev. A 138, A1415 (1965).
24. J. Dho, M. Kim, S. Lee, and W.-J. Lee, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 1362 (1997).
25. P. Grünberg, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 6824 (1981); R. E. Camley and R. L. Stamps, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 2727 (1993).
26. P. Grünberg, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 6824 (1981); R. E. Camley and R. L. Stamps, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 2727 (1993).
27. S. Zhang and P. M. Levy, Phys. Rev. B 43, 11048 (1991).
28. 2, as expected, see equations (5.372) in Slichter's book.
29. 2, as expected, see equations (5.372) in Slichter's book.
30. Landolt-Börnstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, New Series (Springer, New York, 1987).
31. W. H. Meiklejohn and C. P. Bean, Phys. Rev. 105, 904 (1957).
32. R. H. Taylor, R. O'Barr, S. Y. Yamamoto, and B. Dieny, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5036 (1999).
33. A. E. Berkowitz and K. Takano, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 552 (1999).