Problems with use of the end systolic pressure-volume slope as an indicator of left ventricular contractility: An alternate method

Shock

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 285-291

  Krösl, Peter ^a   Abel, Francis L ^b  

^a LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD PRESSURE; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART VENTRICLE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEPTIC SHOCK; SHEEP; SYSTOLE;

ANIMALS; BLOOD PRESSURE; HEART VENTRICLES; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; SHEEP; SHOCK, SEPTIC; SYSTOLE;

EID: 0347596891     PISSN: 10732322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024382-199810000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sagawa K: The ventricular pressure-volume diagram revisited. Circ Res 43:677-687, 1978.
2. Burkhoff D, Sugiura S, Yue DT, Sagawa K: Contractility-dependent curvilinearity of end systolic pressure-volume relations. Am J Physiol 252:H1218-H1227, 1987.
3. Sagawa K: Editorial: The end systolic pressure-volume relation of the ventricle: Definition, modifications and clinical use. Circ 63:1223-1227, 1981.
4. Sagawa K, Maughan L, Suga H, Sunagawa K (eds): Cardiac Contraction, the Pressure-Volume Relationship. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988, pp 3-480.
5. Suga H, Sagawa K: Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle. Circ Res 35:117-126, 1974.
6. Little WC, Freeman GL: Description of LV pressure-volume relations by time-varying elastance and source resistance. Am J Physiol 253:H83-H90, 1987.
7. Shroff SG, Janicki JS, Weber KT: Left ventricular systolic dynamics in terms of its chamber mechanical properties. Am J Physiol 245:H110-H124, 1983.
8. Gupta KB, Bavaria JE, Ratcliff MB, Edmunds LH Jr, Bogen DK: Measurement of end systolic pressure-volume relations by intra-aortic balloon occlusion.. Circ 80:1016-1028, 1989
9. Kass DA, Beyar R, Lankford E, Heard M, Maughan WL, K Sagawa: Influence of contractile state on curvilinearity of in situ end systolic pressure-volume relations. Circ 79:167-178, 1989
10. Krösl P, Pretorius J: Myocardial dysfunction in experimental septic shock. In Schlag G, Redl H (eds): Pathophysiology of Shock, Sepsis and Organ Failure. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer Verlag, 1993, pp 835-852.
11. Krösl P, Pretorius J, Redl H, Schlag G: Myocardial function in septic sheep. Shock 1:325-334, 1994.
12. Neumann K: Regression with unknown model domain. Vienna: Proceedings of the Third International Congress for Statistical Modeling, 1988.
13. Su JB, Crozatier B: Preload-induced curvilinearity of left ventricular end systolic pressure-volume relations: Effects on derived indexes in closed-chest dogs. Circ 79:431-440, 1989.
14. Toombs CF, Vinten-Johansen J, Yokoyama H, Johnston WE, Julian JS, Cordell AR: Nonlinearity of indexes of left ventricular performance: Effects on estimation of slope and diameter axis intercepts. Am J Physiol 260:H1802-H1809, 1991.
15. Van der Velde E, Burkhoff D, Steendijk P, Karsdon J, Sagawa K, Baan J: Nonlinearity and load sensitivity of end systolic pressure-volume relation of canine left ventricle in vivo. Circ 83:315-327, 1991.
16. Crottogini, AJ, Willshaw P, Barra JG, Armentano R, Cabrera-Fischer EJ, Pichl RH: Inconsistency of the slope and volume intercept of the end systolic pressure-volume relationship as individual indexes of inotropic state in conscious dogs. Circ 76:5:1115-1126, 1987.
17. Krösl, P, Pretorius J, Hopf R, Kropik K, Thurnher M, G Schlag: Untersuchungen zur Verwendung der linksventrikulären endsystolischen Druck-Durchmesserbeziehung zur Beurteilung von Kontraktilitätsänderun-gen. Biomed Technik 57:95-97, 1992.
18. Kass DA, Maugham WL: From 'Emax' to pressure-volume relations: A broader view. Circ 77:1203-1212, 1988.
19. Mihailescu LS, Abel FL: Intramyocardial pressure gradients in working and nonworking isolated cat hearts. Am J Physiol 266:H1233-H1241, 1994.
20. Suga H, Yasumura Y, Nozawa T, Futaki S, Tanaka N: Pressure-volume relation around zero transmural pressure in excised cross-circulated dog left ventricle. Circ Res 63:361-372, 1988.
21. Robinson TF, Factor SM, Sonneblick EH: Das Herz als Saugpumpe. Spectrum der Wissenscaft, Februar: 104-110, 1988.
22. Sonnenblick EH: The structural basis and importance of restoring forces and elastic recoil for the filling of the heart. Eur Heart J 1(Suppl.):107-110, 1980.
23. Suga H, Goto Y, Igarashi Y, Yamada O, Nozawa T, Yasumura Y: Ventricular suction under zero source pressure for filling. Am J Physiol 251:H47-H55, 1986.
24. Gilbert JC, Glantz SA: Determinants of left ventricular filling of the diastolic pressure-volume relation. Circ Res 64:827-852, 1989.
25. Mirsky I: Basic terminology and formulae for left ventricular wall stress. In Mirsky I, Ghista DN, Sandler H (eds): Cardiac Mechanics: Physiological, Clinical, and Mathematical Considerations. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1974, pp 3-10.
26. Mirsky I: Assessment of diastolic function: Suggested methods and future considerations. Circulation 69:836-841, 1984.
27. Rankin, JS, Arentzen CE, Ring WS, Edwards CH II, McHale PA, Anderson RW: The diastolic mechanical properties of the intact left ventricle. Fed Proc 39:141-147, 1980.
28. Hammond HK, White PC, Bhargava V, Shabetai R: Heart size and maximal cardiac output are limited by the pericardium. Am J Physiol 263:H1675-H1681, 1992.
29. LeWinter MM, Pavelec R: Influence of the pericardium on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-segment relations during early and later stage of experimental chronic volume overload in dogs. Circ Res 50:501-509, 1982.
30. Kass DA: Clinical evaluation of left heart function by conductance catheter technique. Eur Heart J 13(Suppl. E):57-64, 1992.
31. Strömer H, Cittadini A, Szymanska G, Apstein CS, Morgan JP: Validation of different methods to compare isovolumic cardiac function in isolated hearts of varying sizes. Am J Physiol 272:H501-H510, 1997.
32. Abel FL: Comparative evaluation of pressure and time factors in estimating left ventricular performance. J Appl Physiol 40:196-205, 1976.
33. Abel, FL: Comparative evaluation of myocardial performance factors. In Baan J, Arntzenius AC, Yellin EL (eds): Cardiac Dynamics. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980, pp. 369-379.